Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Outremont, QC · Charitable organization

Congrégation Skver

Organisation religieuse

C$665k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$256k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k10 grants · C$36k
  • C$10k–50k4 grants · C$88k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$284k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$256k
C$8,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANIYEL IRCHOC$256,000
CONGREGATION T.Y.Y.C$135,732
E.M.A.L.F.C$90,000
CONGREGATION KEHAL TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEFC$58,600
BETH TZIPORAHC$33,400
CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREALC$24,167
CONGREGATION TRISKC$20,000
INSTITUT NORAC$10,500
KOLLEL OITZER SHASS INC.C$8,000
CONGREATION BELZC$6,350
C.F. YESHIVATH SHEARITH HAPLETAHC$5,240
HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZALC$4,775
YAD EZER FUNDC$4,750
MENUCHA VESIMCHAC$2,750
MCBC$1,910
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.4M · 18 repeat orgsC$342k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
14

Total granted

C$2.4M
C$292k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+44%

Still filing today

100%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$798k · revenue +153%
  • AI
    ANIYEL IRCHO
    4× · 2017–2024 · C$416k · revenue +320%
  • CT
    CONGREGATION T.Y.Y.
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$394k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • AI
    ANIYEI IRCHO
    one grant, 2023 · C$174k
  • KH
    KEREN HAKEHILLAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$56k · revenue +44%
  • KH
    KUPAS HACHESED MEOROTH
    one grant, 2018 · C$15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
3
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
4
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
5
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
6
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
7
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
8
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
9
Fonds Immobilier Satmar/ Satmar Building Fund

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
10
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
11
Kehilas Tosh

To provide financial assistance to needy people in difficult situations. to provide scholarships to qualified students

—
12
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Académie Yeshiva Toras Moshe de Montréal and the most unlike its peers is Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/36
Grantees still filing
22/36
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM — C$797,650 over 5y, 19% of budgetANIYEL IRCHO — C$415,650 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetCONGREGATION T.Y.Y. — C$393,982 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetE.M.A.L.F. — C$210,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetBETH TZIPORAH — C$104,770 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetC.F. SHEKEL HAKODESH — C$100,700 over 2y, 21% of budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB) — C$89,186 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCONGREGATION KEHAL TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF — C$65,050 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$60,747 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN HAKEHILLA — C$56,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCONGRAGATION YETEV LEV SATMAR — C$45,440 over 4y, 14% of budgetCONGRAGATION BELZ — C$32,120 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL — C$24,893 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION TRISK — C$20,000 over 1y, 65% of budgetBETH ESTHER ACADEMY INC. — C$11,700 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCanadian Friends of Toldos Aharon — C$11,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetINSTITUT NORA — C$10,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE YAD EZER FUND — C$9,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$7,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACADEME YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE DE MONTREAL — C$7,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION SKVER MONTREAL — C$6,500 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetBnot Jerusalem — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetB'NAI LEVY FOUNDATION — C$4,996 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL — C$4,775 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAVERIMI DONNE LA MAIN — C$4,230 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYAM HATALMUD FOUNDATION — C$3,398 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKOLLEL BELZ — C$1,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELZ AVREICHIM COMMUNITY CENTER — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGRAGATION YETEV LEV SATMAR — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBbelz Community Center — C$900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKollel Toldos Yakov Yosef — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL OF TROUT LAKE — C$360 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetChabad Chai Center — C$285 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Maharam Tav FundHatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…The M.K. Foundation/L…Charité Tzedakah Mont…D E Foundation / la F…Menucha VesimchaRosenberg Family Foun…Fondation Ebs/Ebs Fou…Zichron David and Pes…Institution Viznitz /…The Micha Life Founda…
Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB)QC28.2× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Maharam Tav Fund · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Menucha Vesimcha · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Institution Viznitz / Viznitz Institution · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 818028003:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Congrégation Skver’s filings →