Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Anjou, QC · Charitable organization

Congrégation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

C$102k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$67k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k10 grants · C$23k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$13k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$67k
C$3,120
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EZRAS MENACHEM AVROHOM LOAN FUNDC$67,000
MESIFTA YOEL MOSHEC$12,675
BNAI LEVY FOUNDATIONC$6,240
MENUCHA V'SIMCHAC$6,134
KEREN HAKEHILLAC$3,800
BNOS YESHIRINC$3,120
KEREN MENACHEM AVROHOMC$3,000
KEREN HABINYAN D'SATMARC$150
HISACHDIS AVREICHIM D'SATMARC$60
REFUAH V'CHESEDC$36
CONGREGATION YETEV LEVC$30
EIZER MESHULIM FEISHC$10
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$601k · 9 repeat orgsC$386k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

C$601k
C$313k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+40%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MAHARAM TAV FUND
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$99k · revenue +0%
  • CY
    CONG YETEV LEV D'SATMAR
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$19k · revenue +121%
  • MY
    MESIFTA YOEL MOSHE
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$14k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • CA
    CONG AND YETEV LEV D'SATMAR
    one grant, 2019 · C$162k · revenue -22%
  • CA
    CONGREGATION AND YESHIVA S.A.I.A.S
    one grant, 2021 · C$92k · revenue -100% · 46% of their budget
  • C
    CHAREIDIMgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$17k · revenue +57%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Yetev-Lev Free Loan and Aid Society

To provide loans without interest to needy people.

—
3
Ezrat Mehabrim

Issued scholarships for religious education

—
4
Keren Avraham Vshifra Fund

Advancing religious tenets by providing religious instruction. providing interest-free loans and gifts to families in need with the aim of relieving poverty.

—
5
Chesed L'Yakov Free Loan / Prêt sans intérêts La bonté de Yakov

To provide interest free loans to needy people.

—
6
Keren Chasdei Nuchem Free Loan

Provides interest free loan to needy persons

—
7
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
8
Kehilas Tosh

To provide financial assistance to needy people in difficult situations. to provide scholarships to qualified students

—
9
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
10
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
11
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
12
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (Mcb) and the most unlike its peers is Congregation Et Yeshiva S.a.I.a.S. Congregation and Yeshiva S.a.I.a.S.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONG AND YETEV LEV D'SATMAR — C$161,851 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$99,131 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCONGREGATION AND YESHIVA S.A.I.A.S — C$92,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetCONG YETEV LEV D'SATMAR — C$19,283 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCHAREIDIM — C$16,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetEZRAS MENACHEM LOAN FUND — C$16,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMESIFTA YOEL MOSHE — C$13,743 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHEVRAH MESAMCHEI LEV — C$10,700 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMENUCHA V'SIMCHA — C$6,469 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBNAI LEVY FOUNDATION — C$6,240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN MENACHEM AVROHOM — C$6,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetKEREN HAKEHILLA — C$5,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGEMACH ZICHRON BURECH — C$5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTORAH VYIRAH RABBINICAL COLLEGE — C$3,362 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACADEMIE YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMCB — C$400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HABINYAN D'SATMAR — C$150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEIZER MESHULIM FEISH — C$10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The M.K. Foundation/L…Maharam Tav FundEzras Menachem Avroho…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…D E Foundation / la F…VMM Zichron Chaim Cha…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Les Amis Canadiens de…Congregation Sheves A…Académie Beth Esther …Congrégation Good Hea…
The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K.QC17.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Maharam Tav Fund · Ezras Menachem Avrohom Loan Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Les Amis Canadiens de Torah Vyirah Rabbinical College · Congregation Sheves Achim · Académie Beth Esther Inc. / Beth Esther Academy Inc. · Congrégation Good Heart: Congrégation Yetev Lav

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 791411515:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Congrégation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh’s filings →