Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Charité Et Guérison / Refuah V'Chesed

To provide financial assistance to needy people

C$271k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$115k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$9k
  • C$10k–50k4 grants · C$92k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$170k
C$13,760
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EIZER MESHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATIONC$115,000
ACADEMIE BETH ESTHER INC. / BETH ESTHER ACADEMY INC.C$55,000
CHARITÉ TZEDAKAH MONTRÉAL / CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTRÉALC$46,000
KEREN HAKEHILAC$20,000
LA FONDATION DES ÉCOLES JPPS-BIALIKC$13,760
LA COMMUNAUTÉ DE CONGRÉGATION SIMCHAS CHAIMC$12,000
VIZNITZ INSTITUTIONC$3,600
MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESEDC$3,000
CAMP B'NAI BRITH OF MONTREAL FOUNDATION / FONDATION DU CAMPC$2,394
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$664k · 9 repeat orgsC$139k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

C$664k
C$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
-17%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$93k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MAHARAM TAV FUND
    5× · 2017–2022 · C$215k · revenue +238%
  • CT
    CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$124k · revenue +55%
  • EM
    EIZER MESHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$124k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CL
    Chasdei Levy Yitzchok
    one grant, 2018 · C$25k · revenue -20%
  • MV
    MENUCHA VESIMCHAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$9k · revenue +36%
  • H
    HATSOLA
    one grant, 2020 · C$5k · revenue -62%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Ziv Tzedakah Foundation

Solicitation of donations

—
3
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
4
Gemach Zichron Burech Zvi

Provide interest free benevolent loans to needy and to qualified donees

—
5
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
6
The Dov Zimmerman Z'l Foundation

To make donations to charitable organizations

—
7
Mishmeret

During the fiscal period, the organization accepted funds which were dispersed as scholarships to deserving students and to sholars doing research to be used in the study of judaism.

—
8
The Chabad Rehovot Fund
—
9
Mishkan Shaye

Poverty relief to help people in need

—
10
Kupas Hachesed Meoroth

Poverty relief by providing financial assistance to needy people in israel.

—
11
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
12
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La CommunautÉ De CongrÉGation Simchas Chaim and the most unlike its peers is Maharam Tav Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$214,980 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL — C$124,384 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetEIZER MESHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATION — C$123,780 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED — C$66,812 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MISHON LA'CHOLEH — C$66,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetACADEMIE BETH ESTHER INC. / BETH ESTHER ACADEMY INC. — C$55,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLA FONDATION DES ÉCOLES JPPS-BIALIK — C$41,210 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetChasdei Levy Yitzchok — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKEREN HAKEHILA — C$20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe Chofetz Chaim Heritage Foundation — C$19,234 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetLA COMMUNAUTÉ DE CONGRÉGATION SIMCHAS CHAIM — C$12,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$9,410 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM — C$6,515 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHATSOLA — C$5,200 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetANSHEI LUBAVITCH SHOMRIM LABOKER — C$4,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetVIZNITZ INSTITUTION — C$3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP B'NAI BRITH OF MONTREAL FOUNDATION / FONDATION DU CAMP — C$2,394 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetTzeire Dath V'Daath — C$1,100 over 2y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Maharam Tav FundHatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Congrégation BelzMenucha VesimchaThe M.K. Foundation/L…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Congregation Sheves A…Zichron David and Pes…Ezras Menachem Avroho…Shmilu and Sari Rosen…
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC13.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Maharam Tav Fund · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Congrégation Belz · Menucha Vesimcha · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Congregation Sheves Achim · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Ezras Menachem Avrohom Loan Fund · Shmilu and Sari Rosenberg Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 851113761:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Charité Et Guérison / Refuah V'Chesed’s filings →