Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Canadian Friends of Yetev Lev
To rent space in building in israel for use as schools.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$6k
- C$10k–50k3 grants · C$52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHEVRA MESAMCHEI LEV | C$19,885 |
| CONGREGATION YECHIVA ZERA KODESH | C$18,744 |
| CONGREGATION OF THE COMMUNITY OF PREFONTAINE | C$13,000 |
| MIFAL CHAIM BECHESED | C$3,832 |
| CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL | C$1,380 |
| EIZER MESHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATION | C$420 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$13k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CMCHEVRA MESAMCHEI LEV4× · 2018–2024 · C$32k · revenue +176%
- CYCONGREGATION YECHIVA ZERA KODESH3× · 2018–2024 · C$27k · revenue +486%
- ABACADEMIE BETH ESTHER INC.3× · 2018–2023 · C$12k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- AIANIYEI IRCHOgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$11k · revenue +199%
- CFCANADIAN FRIENDS OF VAAD HARABBANIMone grant, 2020 · C$4k · revenue +9%
- MTMAHARAM TAV FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$3k · revenue +53%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm
Issued scholarships for religious education
To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.
Provide interest free benevolent loans to needy and to qualified donees
To provide financial assistance to needy people in difficult situations. to provide scholarships to qualified students
To provide scholarship and assistance to needy students to enable them to follow religious courses at yeshiva toldos aharon for the furtherance of religious study
Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning
Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.
To provice interest free loand to the needy. to provide grants to qualified donees to enable them to carry on their work
To provide scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to follow religious courses given at yeshiva tzvi.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Académie Yeshiva Toras Moshe de Montréal and the most unlike its peers is Association Penimi. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHEVRA MESAMCHEI LEV ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION YECHIVA ZERA KODESH ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION OF THE COMMUNITY OF PREFONTAINE ↗
- Who funds ACADEMIE BETH ESTHER INC. ↗
- Who funds ANIYEI IRCHO ↗
- Who funds CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds MIFAL CHAIM BECHESED ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF VAAD HARABBANIM ↗
- Who funds MAHARAM TAV FUND ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION IMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZ ↗
- Who funds KEREN HATZOLAH ↗
- Who funds HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL ↗
- Who funds CONGRE. & YESHIVA S.A.I.A.S. ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION YETEV LEV D'SATMAR ↗
- Who funds ASSOC. PENIMI ↗
- Who funds EIZER MESHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ACADEMIE YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Maharam Tav Fund · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · École Mesifta Yoel Moshe · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Ezras Menachem Avrohom Loan Fund · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Congrégation Good Heart: Congrégation Yetev Lav · Congregation Sheves Achim · Menucha Vesimcha
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.