Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Outremont, QC · Charitable organization

Canadian Friends of Igud Wiznitz

To advance education by providing books equipment and educational aids to students attending primary schools run by the igud mosdot wiznitz in israel.

C$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,072
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$423k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA TORAS CHAIMC$2,000
CONGREGATION SKVERC$2,000
CONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEFC$1,670
MENUCHA VESIMCHAC$1,072
CONG AMOUR POUR ISRAELC$449
VIZNITZ INSTITUTIONC$200
YALDEI CENTERC$180
KOLEL TORAH V'YIRAHC$54
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 89% of grant dollars (C$109k). The 11% that went abroad (C$14k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 11% of all-years giving (C$14k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$101k · 8 repeat orgsC$21k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

C$101k
C$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+8%

Still filing today

100%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$434 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • YT
    YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$52k · revenue +58%
  • CT
    CONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF
    4× · 2019–2022 · C$6k · revenue +40%
  • CA
    CF ATERET BANOS
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$4k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • BL
    BNEI LEVY
    one grant, 2018 · C$8k
  • M
    MCBgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$4k · revenue +34%
  • CZ
    COMMUNAUTE ZERAH YAKOV
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue -45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
2
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
3
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
4
Communauté Sepharade Hekhal Shalom

Synagogue

—
5
Fondation Sépharade Kollel Avrechim / Sephardic Kollel Avrechim foundation

Organiser et maintenir une synaguogue avec l'object de la pratique et l'avancement de la religion.

—
6
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
7
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
8
Kolel Mareh Yechkel Congregation

To carry on a synagogue and enhance religious awareness

—
9
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
10
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
11
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
12
Congregation Chouva Israel

Operer un synagogue

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congrégation Toldos Yakou Yosef and the most unlike its peers is Institut Cbm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM — C$51,930 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCONGREGATION TZEMACH TZADDIK — C$23,470 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetCONGREGATION SKVER — C$8,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetCONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF — C$5,841 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCF ATERET BANOS — C$4,200 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF — C$3,928 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMCB — C$3,506 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$2,678 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNAUTE ZERAH YAKOV — C$2,216 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCONG AMOUR POUR ISRAEL — C$1,450 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEZRAT ACHIM — C$510 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetREFUAH V'CHESED — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIZNITZ INSTITUTIONS — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYALDEI CENTER — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUT CBM — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST MESIVTA — C$90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOLEL TORAH V'YIRAH — C$54 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rosenberg Family Foun…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Fondation de la Famil…Zichron David and Pes…D E Foundation / la F…The M.K. Foundation/L…Maharam Tav FundJewish Community Foun…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Ezras Menachem Avroho…The Micha Life Founda…
Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille RosenbergQC17.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Maharam Tav Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Ezras Menachem Avrohom Loan Fund · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of schools and education.

Source object 779462928:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Canadian Friends of Igud Wiznitz’s filings →