Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Michigan · Nonprofit

Work Play Love Inc

Work Play Love Inc (Michigan) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $231,729 to it, the largest being Network for Good ($185,652). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 88% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$165k
Revenue FY2025
4
Funders on record
$232k
Grants received
$180k
Net assets
3/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 47%

Against its field

Work Play Love Inc runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,211 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin20% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,211 international nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($104k) Expenses 100 ($72k) Net assets 100 ($100k)2018 Revenue 135 ($141k) Expenses 162 ($117k) Net assets 124 ($125k)2019 Revenue 111 ($115k) Expenses 121 ($87k) Net assets 152 ($153k)2020 Revenue 102 ($106k) Expenses 93 ($67k) Net assets 62 ($62k)2021 Revenue 112 ($117k) Expenses 121 ($87k) Net assets 92 ($92k)2022 Revenue 113 ($117k) Expenses 148 ($106k) Net assets 103 ($104k)2023 Revenue 135 ($140k) Expenses 196 ($141k) Net assets 108 ($108k)2024 Revenue 191 ($198k) Expenses 215 ($155k) Net assets 147 ($148k)2025 Revenue 159 ($165k) Expenses 184 ($133k) Net assets 180 ($180k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (159)Expenses (184)Net assets (180)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of Work Play Love Inc’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,956 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$32k
17
$24k
18
$28k
19
$40k
20
$30k
21
$11k
22
$227
23
$44k
24
$33k
25
12
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2021 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $28k → $47k.

3 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)88% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Work Play Love Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Work Play Love Inc leans on a few funders — its largest provides 80% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

88% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Work Play Love Inc.

80%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 99% · 2022 100% · 2023 79%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

88% of Work Play Love Inc's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $28k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Michigan, across 1 state.

IL

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $204k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Work Play Love Inc

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Work Play Love Inc: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Work Play Love Inc?
Work Play Love Inc (Michigan) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $231,729 to it, the largest being Network for Good ($185,652). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 88% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Work Play Love Inc have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $231,729 in grants to Work Play Love Inc, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Work Play Love Inc?
Network for Good is the largest funder on record, with $185,652 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Work Play Love Inc find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing