California · Nonprofit
WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT
WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $297,554 to it, the largest being NOVO FOUNDATION ($175,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2022
- $155
- Funders on record
- 5
- Grants received
- $298k
- Net assets
- $-10995
What Women's Economic Agenda Project does
Mission
The Women's Economic Agenda Project ("weap") demands economic human rights for poor women and their families. Weap envisions a world in which all women and their families have the skills, healthcare, shelter, and nourishment they need to enjoy happy, healthy, and productive lives. Weap implements this vision by building the leadership of low-income women through education, training, and advocacy. Weap recognizes that the policies that affect the poorest of our sisters affect all people. Weap works to change societal and governmental policies that relegate women to the bottom ofthe economic pyramid by raising the role and visibility of poor and working people in crafting real solutions to the economic and social injustices of our time.
As stated on its FY2022 Form 990-EZ.
Programs
Weap provides trainings to the public on the interrelationship of poverty elimination and adequate healthcare. It also holds trainings on healthcare, human rights, and issues of economic security.
Weap organizes and facilitates group action, such as teach-ins and group demonstrations of support or opposition to issues related to inequality and the rights of the poor.
$524 spent100% of program spendingWeap publishes a regular online newsletter that provides updates and resources related to the elimination of poverty and securing economic equality. It also publishes an online toolkit for low-income individuals to inform them of their rights and resources.
Other
The 4 programs described on its FY2022 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $524.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $355k to $43k (−88%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $30k → $16.
4 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 41% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 59% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
41% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 67% · 2018 61% · 2019 71% · 2020 71% · 2021 56% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 1 state in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $123k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Organizations like WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
35%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT?
- WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $297,554 to it, the largest being NOVO FOUNDATION ($175,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $297,554 in grants to WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT?
- NOVO FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $175,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like WOMEN'S ECONOMIC AGENDA PROJECT find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Women's Economic Agenda Project →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2017–2022), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing