Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Texas State Aquarium Association

The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Animals$243kEducation$50kHealth$20kEnvironment$17kScience & Tech$6k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$94M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC$15,000
CLEARWATER MARINE AQUARIUM$10,500
THE FLORIDA AQUARIUM$10,000
ALLIANCE OF MARINE MAMMALS$9,544
ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS & AQUARIUMS$5,150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TEXAS A&M - CORPUS CHRISTI FDN: $50k → 17%CAESAR KLEBERG WILDLIFE RES INS: $10k → 27%SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $15k → 11%CLEARWATER MARINE AQUARIUM: $11k → 12%SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $15k → 13%THE FLORIDA AQUARIUM: $10k → 13%LIONFISH INVITATIONAL INC: $6k → 13%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY HARBOR: $20k → 13%INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%WATERBIRD SOCIETY: $15k → 12%BROOKFIELD ZOOCHICAGO ZOOL SOC: $10k → 14%WILDLIFE RESTORATION FDN: $7k → 7%ALLIANCE OF MARINE MAMMALS: $10k → 9%ASSOC OF ZOOS AND AQUARIUMS: $58k → 8%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MSI: $17k → 17%PADRE ISLAND NATIONAL SEASHORE: $19k → 27%SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $15k → 13%CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 14%ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS & AQUARIUMS: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$153k · 3 repeat orgs$184k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$153k
$154k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+43%

Still filing today

100%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24
AnimalsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOOLOGICAL PARKS AND AQUARIUMS INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $88k · revenue +83%
  • SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue -24%
  • Chicago Zoological Society
    2× · 2018–2021 · $20k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • TA
    TEXAS A&M - CORPUS CHRISTI FDN
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • FA
    FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • PI
    PADRE ISLAND NATIONAL SEASHORE
    one grant, 2018 · $19k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Carolina Aquarium

Our mission is to inspire conservation of the natural world by exhibiting and caring for animals, by excelling in education and research, and by providing an exceptional visitor experience.

Animals
2
Marine Megafauna Foundation

Save threatened marine life using pioneering research, education, and sustainable conservation solutions

International
3
Wildlife Protection Solutions

To protect endangered species.

Animals
4
Alaska Whale Foundation

Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.

Environment
5
National Marine Mammal Foundation Inc

The nmmf's mission is to improve and protect life for marine mammals, humans, and our shared oceans through science, service, and education. our vision is to be the leading laboratory in marine mammal science, where critical questions…

Animals
6
Sea to Shore Alliance

Research, education and conservation work to improve the health & productivity of coastal envirmonments for endangered species & human livlihoods that depend on them.

7
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
8
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
9
Zoo Miami Foundation Inc

Zoo Miami Foundation's mission is to inspire people to preserve nature and motivate others to join us through community engagement, fundraising, and building relationships.

Animals
10
Marine Science Institute

The institutes mission is to cultivate a responsibility for the natural environment and our human communities through interdisciplinary science education.

11
American Ornithological Society

See schedule othe american ornithological society (aos) is an international membership organization that connects ornithologists, science, and bird conservation by supporting science that advances the understanding and conservation of…

Science & Tech
12
Zoo Conservation Outreach Group Inc

To support wildlife and habitat conservation in the americas.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Manatee Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lionfish Invitational Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOOLOGICAL PARKS AND AQUARIUMS INC — $87,650 · AnimalsAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOOLOGICAL PARKS AND AQUARIUMS INCSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC — $45,000 · AnimalsSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INCChicago Zoological Society — $20,000 · AnimalsChicago Zoological SocietyClearwater Marine Aquarium Inc — $10,500 · AnimalsClearwater Marine Aquarium IncINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · AnimalsThe Florida Aquarium Inc — $10,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE RESTORATION FOUNDATION — $7,000 · AnimalsTEXAS A&M - CORPUS CHRISTI FDN — $50,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M - CORPUS CHRISTI FDNFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY — $19,522 · OtherFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITYPADRE ISLAND NATIONAL SEASHORE — $18,625 · OtherPADRE ISLAND NATIONAL SEASHOREUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN — $17,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINWATERBIRD SOCIETY — $15,000 · OtherWATERBIRD SOCIETYCAESAR KLEBERG WILDLIFE RES INS — $10,000 · OtherCAESAR KLEBERG WILDLIFE RES INSALLIANCE OF MARINE MAMMAL PARKS & AQUARI — $9,544 · OtherALLIANCE OF MARINE MAMMAL PARKS & AQUARILionfish Invitational Inc — $6,400 · Food & Nutrition
Animals$190,150Other$139,691Food & Nutrition$6,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOOLOGICAL PARKS AND AQUARIUMS INC — $87,650 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetChicago Zoological Society — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWATERBIRD SOCIETY — $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetClearwater Marine Aquarium Inc — $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Florida Aquarium Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE OF MARINE MAMMAL PARKS & AQUARI — $9,544 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Texas State Aquarium Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc1% of income from government
  • The Florida Aquarium Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph