Skip to content

Nebraska · Nonprofit

WETEACHTHINK

WETEACHTHINK (Nebraska) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,082 to it, the largest being LARRY AND MAGGIE KOPSA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ($1,700). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$228k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$4k
Net assets
$53k
4/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Weteachthink does

Mission

The mission of Weteachthink is to encourage factual sharing of information to positively impact public perception of what it means to be human and to instill a desire of the general public to protect human life.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Designing multimedia campaigns to directly influence public education, awareness, and perception of human dignity and rights.

    $148,364 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $148,364.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($191k) Expenses 100 ($147k) Net assets 100 ($47k)2022 Revenue 199 ($381k) Expenses 250 ($368k) Net assets 128 ($60k)2023 Revenue 123 ($235k) Expenses 182 ($267k) Net assets 58 ($27k)2024 Revenue 98 ($187k) Expenses 128 ($189k) Net assets 55 ($26k)2025 Revenue 119 ($228k) Expenses 136 ($200k) Net assets 113 ($53k)
20212022202320242025
Revenue (119)Expenses (136)Net assets (113)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $63k to $30k (−52%).

$52k
$63k
$30k
$34k
$56k
20212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of WETEACHTHINK’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (57% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,946 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$44k
’21
$13k
’22
−$33k
’23
−$2k
’24
$27k
’25
3.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Angela Copenhaver

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

2022202320242025
Listed6998
Joined·+3+0+0
No longer listed·001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income fell $500 → $309.

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WETEACHTHINK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WETEACHTHINK leans on a few funders — its largest provides 42% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

42%
largest funder
96%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 77% · 2022 94% · 2023 81% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

WETEACHTHINK draws 56% of its grant income from funders outside Nebraska, across 3 states in all.

NY
NE
MO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
Nebraska out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $182 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WETEACHTHINK runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 16,849 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin12% · above the median
Months of reserve3.3mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 16,849 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like WETEACHTHINK

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Nebraska

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

74% of spending goes to programs.

Program 74%Management 15%Fundraising 11%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

90%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WETEACHTHINK: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WETEACHTHINK?
WETEACHTHINK (Nebraska) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,082 to it, the largest being LARRY AND MAGGIE KOPSA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ($1,700). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WETEACHTHINK have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $4,082 in grants to WETEACHTHINK, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WETEACHTHINK?
LARRY AND MAGGIE KOPSA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,700 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WETEACHTHINK find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nebraska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2021–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing