Virginia · Nonprofit
VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (Virginia) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $158,410 to it, the largest being Virginia Law Foundation ($145,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM has grown faster than half of the 6,881 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,881 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Annabella R Jenkins Foundationlocalportfolio match
- Herndon Foundationshared funderslocal
- Leclairryan Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 54% · 2018 50% · 2020 86% · 2021 91% · 2022 90% · 2023 85% · 2024 96% · 2025 95%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
103% of VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (83% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $25k → $20k.
3 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 7% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM leans on a few funders — its largest provides 92% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 78% · 2019 99% · 2020 73% · 2021 99% · 2022 99% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM's grant income comes from Virginia funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $11k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Annabella R Jenkins Foundationlocalportfolio matchVA · funds 60 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Herndon Foundationshared funderslocalVA · backs 52 organizations that share your funders · funds 138 organizations near you
- Leclairryan Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Foundation II of the American College of Trial Lawyers Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Educationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- American College of Bankruptcy Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- American Association for Justiceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Potomac Health Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Health Law Program Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The District of Columbia Bar Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Equal Justice Worksportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- American Bar Endowmentportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Virginia
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
85% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM?
- VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (Virginia) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $158,410 to it, the largest being Virginia Law Foundation ($145,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $158,410 in grants to VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM?
- Virginia Law Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $145,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like VIRGINIA JUDGES AND LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing