Loading…
Loading…
Louisiana · Nonprofit
UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MANAGEMENT (Louisiana) is funded by 8 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $106,775,479 in grants to it, the largest being Children's Hospital Inc ($62,267,217). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MANAGEMENT's revenue grew 17% between 2018 and 2024.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,388 health nonprofits over $100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2024 1%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
1% of UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MANAGEMENT’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (1% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
$92k from 3 funders in 2023, up from $16M and 4 in 2018.
From the IRS filings of UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MANAGEMENT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 6 of 8 funders by total. Association, not causation.
UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MANAGEMENT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 58% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 63% · 2022 70% · 2023 62% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MANAGEMENT is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Louisiana funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 8 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
84% of spending goes to programs.
Part of a family of 14 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 8funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing