Pennsylvania · Nonprofit
TRIBE 12
TRIBE 12 (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $421,715 to it, the largest being LASKO FAMILY FOUNDATION ($105,000). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
TRIBE 12's revenue grew 67% between 2017 and 2025.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,660 religion nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundationshared fundersportfolio match
- Upstart Bay Areaportfolio match
- National Center to Encourage Judaismportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
93% of TRIBE 12’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 6 funders, grant income fell $50k → $38k.
3 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 14% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
Left out of every figure on this page: $2.8M from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia). These are real filings, and they are not money TRIBE 12 raised.
From the IRS filings of TRIBE 12’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
TRIBE 12 has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 76% · 2020 80% · 2021 67% · 2022 99% · 2023 65% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
33% of TRIBE 12's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 53% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
67% of TRIBE 12's grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $60k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 15 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundationshared fundersportfolio matchCA · backs 56 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Upstart Bay Areaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Center to Encourage Judaismportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Sherrie R Savett Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Jews of Color Initiativeportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ruth Reinhard Fletcher Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Raymond Klein Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lippman Kanfer Foundation for Living Torahportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Nash Family Foundationshared fundersNY · backs 32 organizations that share your funders
- The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundationshared fundersPA · backs 40 organizations that share your funders
- Jewish Community Foundation of Orange Countyshared fundersCA · backs 46 organizations that share your funders
- The Harold Grinspoon Foundationshared fundersMA · backs 35 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like TRIBE 12
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Pennsylvania
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
49% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
96%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for TRIBE 12: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds TRIBE 12?
- TRIBE 12 (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $421,715 to it, the largest being LASKO FAMILY FOUNDATION ($105,000). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does TRIBE 12 have?
- IRS filings report 15 organizations giving $421,715 in grants to TRIBE 12, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of TRIBE 12?
- LASKO FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $105,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like TRIBE 12 find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 15funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing