Skip to content

Ohio · Nonprofit

THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL

THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL (Ohio) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $71,770 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ($25,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 74% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$494k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$72k
Net assets
$355k
0/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 13%
01What it does

What The Reckoning International does

Mission

Our mission is to mobilize people and resources to transform the lives of families living in chronic poverty and under development.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The filing organization works with affiliated organizations we've built relationships with in countries where aid is provided. These affiliates share our passion and purpose and help the reckoning reach those in need. The organization also has at least one full-time missionary in africa to help with administration, over-seeing projects, educational training, and agricultural programs. This is all made possible through the help of our affiliates and generous donors.

    $337,538 spentof which $240,781 as grants
    90% of program spending
  2. The organization operates and funds livelihood development programs. The key to overcoming poverty in the third world is empowering people to develop their own gifts and skill-sets so they can build a livelihood and to coach them in business management so they can thrive and bless others in need. This year the organization continued support for orphaned children in uganda. The organization invested in several workshops for micro businesses and skills training. Please see our website for personal stories and ways you can get involved at www.thereckoning.org.

    $36,179 spent
    10% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $373,717.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($184k) Expenses 100 ($175k) Net assets 100 ($128k)2018 Revenue 84 ($155k) Expenses 110 ($191k) Net assets 72 ($92k)2019 Revenue 113 ($207k) Expenses 114 ($199k) Net assets 78 ($100k)2020 Revenue 182 ($334k) Expenses 160 ($280k) Net assets 120 ($154k)2021 Revenue 371 ($682k) Expenses 279 ($488k) Net assets 272 ($348k)2022 Revenue 158 ($290k) Expenses 232 ($404k) Net assets 182 ($234k)2023 Revenue 187 ($344k) Expenses 156 ($273k) Net assets 238 ($305k)2024 Revenue 205 ($377k) Expenses 199 ($348k) Net assets 261 ($334k)2025 Revenue 269 ($494k) Expenses 271 ($473k) Net assets 277 ($355k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (269)Expenses (271)Net assets (277)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $158k to $350k (+122%).

$129k
$92k
$100k
$158k
$350k
$235k
$307k
$335k
$363k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$9k
’17
−$36k
’18
$8k
’19
$54k
’20
$194k
’21
−$114k
’22
$71k
’23
$29k
’24
$21k
’25
9.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Tim Troyer

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed556666455
Joined·+0+2+0+0+0+0+1+0
No longer listed·01000200
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2020: the base held at 2 funders, grant income fell $17k → $10k.

4 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 74% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 35% of grant income and the top three 82%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

74% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL.

35%
largest funder
82%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 82% · 2018 100% · 2020 50% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

74% of THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $19k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Ohio funders.

OH

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’20
Ohio out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $53k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ohio

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

79% of spending goes to programs.

Program 79%Management 20%Fundraising 1%

Governance

5
board members
80%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OH

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL?
THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL (Ohio) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $71,770 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ($25,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 74% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $71,770 in grants to THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL.
Who is the largest funder of THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL?
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $25,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE RECKONING INTERNATIONAL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing