Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB

THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $878 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($524). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 60% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$23k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$878
Net assets
$489k
1/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What The Mission San Jose Warriors Boosters Club does

Mission

The purpose of the boosters club is to increase parental awareness and support for the athletics and visual & performing arts department at mission san jose high school located in fremont, ca

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Provide funding support to the athmetic department for officials; league, conference & state fees; athletic equipment; sports field restotation and gym floor refinishing

    $5,238 spent
    23% of program spending
  2. Provide funding support to the visual & performing arts department for musical instruments; computer lab equipment; software upgrades; band/colorguard uniforms & flags; theatre equipment; costumes; sheet music; kilns;art media & photography equipment and supplies

    $15,540 spent
    69% of program spending
  3. Provide funding support for the associated student body for items not covered adquately by the msjhs operating budget. These funds benefits the entire student body including classroom supplies; equipment and equipment repair; other supplies as requested.

    $1,691 spent
    8% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $22,469.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($61k) Expenses 100 ($43k) Net assets 100 ($338k)2018 Revenue 90 ($55k) Expenses 139 ($59k) Net assets 102 ($345k)2019 Revenue 92 ($56k) Expenses 136 ($58k) Net assets 100 ($337k)2020 Revenue 91 ($56k) Expenses 83 ($35k) Net assets 108 ($365k)2021 Revenue 104 ($63k) Expenses 94 ($40k) Net assets 141 ($476k)2022 Revenue 149 ($91k) Expenses 155 ($66k) Net assets 113 ($381k)2023 Revenue 71 ($43k) Expenses 62 ($27k) Net assets 128 ($432k)2024 Revenue 43 ($26k) Expenses 121 ($52k) Net assets 131 ($445k)2025 Revenue 37 ($23k) Expenses 59 ($25k) Net assets 145 ($489k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (37)Expenses (59)Net assets (145)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $365k to $476k (+31%).

$338k
$345k
$337k
$365k
$476k
$381k
$432k
$445k
$489k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

69% of THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (65% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 26,798 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$19k
’17
−$4k
’18
−$2k
’19
$20k
’20
$23k
’21
$25k
’22
$17k
’23
−$25k
’24
−$3k
’25
49
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed10107777777
Joined·+0+2+0+1+0+6+1+0
No longer listed·05010610
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $150 → $205.

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 60% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB leans on a few funders — its largest provides 60% of grant income and the top three 91%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

60% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB.

60%
largest funder
91%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 63% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

60% of THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $354 that is directly attributable, 58% of it comes from funders outside California, across 3 states.

MA
CA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’19
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $524 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB is better cushioned than half of the 17,277 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−11% · below the median
Months of reserve49.0mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−12% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,277 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 10%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

85%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB?
THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $878 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($524). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 60% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $878 in grants to THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $524 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE MISSION SAN JOSE WARRIORS BOOSTERS CLUB find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Mission San Jose Warriors Boosters Club →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing