Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

American Diabetes Association

The mission of the American Diabetes Association is to prevent and cure diabetes and to improve the lives of all people affected by diabetes.

$26M
Granted FY2024still arriving
241
Grants FY2024still arriving
35
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$92MEducation$12MFood & Nutrition$9.7MScience & Tech$4.9MCommunity Improvement$401kRecreation & Sports$355kHuman Services$225kInternational$148kOther$0
02FY2024 · 241 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $179k
  • $10k–50k49 grants · $836k
  • $50k–250k152 grants · $19M
  • $250k+10 grants · $6.2M
$73,652
Median grant
35
States reached
$254M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Pennsylvania$1,625,000
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill$1,620,708
Washington University$753,141
Children's Hospital of Chicago$420,929
David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles$325,000
Tufts University$305,042
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus$296,003
Colorado State University$289,196
Colorado School of Public Health$282,800
The Scripps Research Institute$260,000
Childrens Hospital Los Angeles$200,000
Wake Forest University Health Sciences$200,000
University of Utah$200,000
University of Maryland School of Medicine$200,000
Michigan State University$200,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $241k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%YMCA of Silicon Valley: $78k → 8%Diabetes Education and Camping Association: $5k → 11%YMCA OF THE SUNCOAST INC: $12k → 12%Refugee Women's Network Inc: $10k → 14%YMCA of Silicon Valley: $13k → 8%YMCA OF GREATER ST PETERSBURG: $14k → 12%YMCA of Silicon Valley: $9k → 8%NM Child First Network: $10k → 14%New Mexico Child First Network: $10k → 14%Denver Indian Health & Family Services Inc: $10k → 7%New Mexico Veterans Integration Centers: $15k → 14%Project 658 Inc: $10k → 10%Exodus Treatment Center Inc: $13k → 14%Mercy Housing Mountain Plains: $33k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$110M · 120 repeat orgs$5.7M to everyone else

120 repeat relationships — 99 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 49 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

120
72

Total granted

$110M
$4.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+18%

Still filing today

57%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5.8M · revenue +41%
  • Northwestern University
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +4%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • PA
    PATIENT ADVOCATE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -58%
  • University of Illinois Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $325k · revenue +70%
  • IU
    Indiana University School of Medicine
    one grant, 2022 · $325k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
2
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
3
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
6
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
7
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
8
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
9
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
10
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Esperanza Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bfit Big Dreams Youth Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Community College Foundatio…Food Banks and PantriesJewish Community Organizati…Ymca Youth DevelopmentImmigrant Worker SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyMilitary Veterans SupportLocal Food System Organizat…Independent K-12 SchoolsYouth Sports ProgramsCancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%65%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%6/245
the rest of the field
13%
240,390/1,819,320

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

141 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 141 of the 245 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
137/141
Grantees still filing
94/141
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

American Diabetes Association Research Foundation Inc — $44,098,033 · OtherAmerican Diabetes Association Research Foundation IncREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $4,900,703 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO+88 more — $27,070,582 · Other+88 moreWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $5,775,204 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEA…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $2,634,302 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $1,458,141 · EducationCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,434,180 · EducationIndiana University Foundation — $1,339,000 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $1,089,016 · EducationVanderbilt University — $1,028,224 · EducationPATIENT ADVOCATE FOUNDATION — $1,025,000 · EducationTexas A&M Foundation — $1,023,823 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $956,999 · Education+28 more — $10,334,020 · Education+28 moreAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $1,177,820 · HealthAnn & Rober…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $975,000 · HealthDana-Farber…Children's Hospital Los Angeles — $800,000 · HealthChildren's …The Broad Institute Inc — $753,123 · HealthThe Broad I…BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE — $716,215 · HealthBECKMAN RES…Children's Hospital Corporation — $685,984 · HealthChildren's …CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $596,576 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $520,392 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $480,456 · HealthPIONEER VALLEY LIFE SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF BAYSTATE MEDICAL & UMASS AMHERSTINC — $429,659 · HealthHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE — $413,970 · Health+39 more — $4,532,770 · Health+39 moreNorthwestern University — $2,514,119 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $60,000 · Recreation & SportsTOP BOX FOODS — $592,717 · Food & NutritionSHARING EXCESS — $100,000 · Food & NutritionOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC — $30,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $27,200 · Food & NutritionYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY — $99,250 · Human ServicesMERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS — $33,333 · Human ServicesNEW MEXICO CHILD FIRST NETWORK INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesNEW MEXICO VETERANS INTEGRATION CENTERS — $15,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST PETERSBURG INC — $13,820 · Human ServicesEXODUS TREATMENT CENTER — $12,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SUNCOAST INC — $12,248 · Human ServicesProject 658 Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesDENVER INDIAN HEALTH AND FAMILY SER — $10,000 · Human ServicesVuela for Health — $43,333 · Community ImprovementGRAMEEN AMERICA INC — $30,000 · Community ImprovementWEST COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP — $23,333 · Community ImprovementDC Greens Inc — $10,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $10,000 · Community ImprovementNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$76,069,318Education$28,097,909Health$12,081,965Recreation & Sports$2,574,119Food & Nutrition$749,917Human Services$226,151Community Improvement$126,666

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican Diabetes Association Research Foundation Inc — $44,098,033 over 4y, 79% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $5,775,204 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $2,634,302 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $2,514,119 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $1,458,141 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,434,180 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $1,339,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $1,177,820 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $1,089,016 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University — $1,028,224 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPATIENT ADVOCATE FOUNDATION — $1,025,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $1,023,823 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $975,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $956,999 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ohio University Foundation — $874,513 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYale University — $828,036 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $827,496 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $800,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc — $753,123 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $751,145 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $722,801 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE — $716,215 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $696,173 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $685,984 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $650,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $600,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation — $596,981 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $596,576 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTOP BOX FOODS — $592,717 over 5y, 18% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $520,392 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $510,709 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $481,219 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $480,456 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $414,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE — $413,970 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $404,867 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC — $399,217 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT VIRGINIA — $341,110 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $334,356 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $325,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY — $324,977 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATION — $301,714 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $276,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $271,031 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunities Improvement Association Incorporated — $264,297 over 2y, 77% of budgetJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC — $225,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe diaTribe Foundation — $213,668 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetUniversity of Maryland Medical System Corporation — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Diabetes Association Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds PATIENT ADVOCATE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Ohio University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds The Broad Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Heart Associ…Breakthrough T1dJohns Hopkins Univers…American Diabetes Ass…American Cancer Socie…Georgetown UniversityThe George Washington…The Children's Hospit…Reach Out and Read IncRheumatology Research…Mayo ClinicYale University
American Heart Association IncTX31× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Heart Association Inc · Breakthrough T1d · Johns Hopkins University · American Diabetes Association Research Foundation Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Georgetown University · The George Washington University · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Reach Out and Read Inc · Rheumatology Research Foundation · Mayo Clinic · Yale University

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Diabetes Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Joslin Diabetes Center Inc — 35% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (Ashp) — 1% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation — 0% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Medical System Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Saint Peter's University — 0% of income from government
  • Holy Cross Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 245 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines