Skip to content

West Virginia · Nonprofit

THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC

THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC (West Virginia) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $148,500 to it, the largest being Human Dog Bond Seven ($72,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$264k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$149k
Net assets
$2.0M
2/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 68%
01What it does

What The Human-Animal Bond Inc does

Mission

To conduct research, education, and training in the area of the human-animal bond with the outcome of benefiting the human and animal condition.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Service dog training and placement: service dog training and placement: thirty-six dogs participated in program with 5 dogs being part of breeding program. Thirteen puppies were housed and received basic obedience training/socialized by community fosters with the support of our staff. An average of 14 adult dogs were in advanced training at federal correction institute, morgantown throughout the year. At any one time 10-15 inmates and 2 correctional officers were involved in the program which served to both train dogs and provide educational rehabilitation for inmates. We continued to offer online (2 per year) and in person (6 per year) service dog training classes in collaboration with west virginia university (wvu) with approximately 150 students participating throughout the year. Two of our breeding dogs whelped this year with 12 of their puppies entering the program. Student workers and volunteers raised the pups in 2 volunteers homes for 8-10 weeks until placement with community fosters. Over 50 veterans participated in the service dog program this year with 50 submitting eligibility surveys, 10 applications for dogs were received and 7 went through online classes and in…

    $75,952 spent
    69% of program spending
  2. Rehabilitation and special education (disability awareness): we continued to conduct disability awareness outreach both on campus and in the local community throughout 2024. Therapy dogs and service dogs in training accompanied staff to schools, veterans facilities, legislative and other community events to educate the public on the roles and value of assistance dogs in mobility and mental health rehabilitation and wellness. Therapy dogs continue to provide ongoing support to faculty, students, patients at wvu hospitals and staff. One dog works in the wvu childrens hospital, one in the school of public health and 7 others in other colleges and departments throughout the university. Dogs interact daily on campus providing stress reduction among students and faculty/staff. Contact hours exceed 9,000 hours.

    $11,354 spent
    10% of program spending
  3. Ridgeway farm: the human animal bond continued to manage the cheat lake farmers market, where it supported 8-10 local farmers and served as a valuable source of locally grown produce for over 200 community members throughout the spring, summer and fall months. We continued to offer community garden plots with seven groups participating. Most grew for their families but one focused on growing and selling heritage seeds and another sold at the farmers market expanding our reach. We collaborated with the obesity medicine program at wvu hospitals by hosting a weekly healthy eating program over the summer where, as part of their clinical program, alongside physicians and nutritionist, patients learned to prepare healthy meals using locally grown vegetables and had dinners together at the farmhouse. An arts at ridgeway farm festival was hosted in the fall where 30 local artists displayed and sold their work throughout the property. The event was organized by 30 volunteers from the community and wvu and drew over 250 visitors. We have further opened the property to the community by hosting birthday and holiday parties, encouraging families to enjoy nature and the outdoor spaces. We…

    $11,353 spent
    10% of program spending
  4. The jasmine project at quarry run: we continued with property improvement projects at the quarry run property focusing mainly on landscaping this year.

    $11,353 spent
    10% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $110,012.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($33k) Expenses 100 ($35k) Net assets 100 ($1.5M)2018 Revenue 111 ($36k) Expenses 157 ($54k) Net assets 99 ($1.5M)2019 Revenue 319 ($105k) Expenses 94 ($33k) Net assets 104 ($1.6M)2020 Revenue 325 ($107k) Expenses 92 ($32k) Net assets 108 ($1.7M)2021 Revenue 217 ($71k) Expenses 122 ($42k) Net assets 110 ($1.7M)2022 Revenue 325 ($107k) Expenses 165 ($57k) Net assets 113 ($1.7M)2023 Revenue 559 ($183k) Expenses 203 ($70k) Net assets 121 ($1.9M)2024 Revenue 805 ($264k) Expenses 372 ($129k) Net assets 130 ($2.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (805)Expenses (372)Net assets (130)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $2.5M to $2.6M (+5%).

$2.2M
$2.2M
$2.3M
$2.4M
$2.4M
$2.4M
$2.5M
$2.6M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

102% of THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,870 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$2k
’17
−$18k
’18
$72k
’19
$75k
’20
$29k
’21
$50k
’22
$113k
’23
$136k
’24
25
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Barbara Jean Meade

Chairman of board

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed88333334
Joined·+1+0+0+0+0+2+1
No longer listed·1500020
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2022 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $72k → $11k.

2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 36% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 91%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

84% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC.

48%
largest funder
91%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 100% · 2023 67% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside West Virginia, across 1 state in all.

PA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’22
’23
West Virginia out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $53k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 21,616 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin51% · top quartile
Months of reserve25.1mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)35% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 21,616 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In West Virginia

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

86% of spending goes to programs.

Program 86%Management 14%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

66%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC?
THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC (West Virginia) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $148,500 to it, the largest being Human Dog Bond Seven ($72,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $148,500 in grants to THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC?
Human Dog Bond Seven is the largest funder on record, with $72,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in West Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Human-Animal Bond →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing