Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

California · Nonprofit

The Animal Protectorates

The Animal Protectorates (California) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $93,688 to it, the largest being THE ROBERT H BRETHEN FOUNDATION ($44,500). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$81k
Revenue FY2024
9
Funders on record
$94k
Grants received
$165k
Net assets
5/9 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 17%

Against its field

The Animal Protectorates runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 4,983 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin37% · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−19% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,983 animals nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($345k) Expenses 100 ($329k) Net assets 100 ($44k)2018 Revenue 92 ($317k) Expenses 96 ($315k) Net assets 104 ($45k)2019 Revenue 93 ($321k) Expenses 82 ($271k) Net assets 219 ($95k)2020 Revenue 44 ($152k) Expenses 47 ($156k) Net assets 209 ($91k)2021 Revenue 24 ($82k) Expenses 18 ($58k) Net assets 250 ($109k)2022 Revenue 27 ($92k) Expenses 15 ($48k) Net assets 350 ($152k)2023 Revenue 22 ($77k) Expenses 29 ($95k) Net assets 309 ($135k)2024 Revenue 23 ($81k) Expenses 15 ($51k) Net assets 378 ($165k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (23)Expenses (15)Net assets (378)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

89% of The Animal Protectorates’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 6,568 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$16k
17
$2k
18
$50k
19
$4k
20
$24k
21
$44k
22
$18k
23
$30k
24
3.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $2k → $10k.

1 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of The Animal Protectorates’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

The Animal Protectorates leans on a few funders — its largest provides 47% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

47%
largest funder
95%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 78% · 2018 91% · 2019 72% · 2020 87% · 2021 98% · 2022 98% · 2023 96%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

25% of The Animal Protectorates's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

The Animal Protectorates draws 51% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 6 states in all.

NY
CA
DE
TN
NC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $913 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 9 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like The Animal Protectorates

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

93%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for The Animal Protectorates: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds The Animal Protectorates?
The Animal Protectorates (California) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $93,688 to it, the largest being THE ROBERT H BRETHEN FOUNDATION ($44,500). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does The Animal Protectorates have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $93,688 in grants to The Animal Protectorates, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of The Animal Protectorates?
THE ROBERT H BRETHEN FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $44,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like The Animal Protectorates find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing