Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION

SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $69,149 to it, the largest being AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY ($36,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$353k
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$69k
Net assets
$574k
2/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 16%
01What it does

What Sylvia Bozeman and Rhonda Hughes Edge Foundation does

Mission

The mission of the Sylvia Bozeman and Rhonda Hughes EDGE Foundation is to strengthen the ability of female students to successfully complete graduate programs in the mathematical sciences. In addition to a summer program for entering graduate students, the EDGE Foundation provides ongoing support for women pursuing careers in the mathematical sciences at several critical stages of their careers.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The EDGE SUMMER PROGRAM. The EDGE Summer Program is an intensive immersion experience where a cohort of new graduate students, plus three graduate mentors, five faculty, a difficult dialogues facilitator and guest speakers work together to provide a secure academic foundation and supportive network for the next years of graduate school. The 2025 EDGE Summer Program was hosted in June 2025 at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Most expenses were paid before July 1, 2025, such as travel and stipends.

    $148,155 spentof which $96,150 as grants
    85% of program spending
  2. The Karen EDGE Fellowship In May 2019, the EDGE Foundation received a one-time contribution from Karen Uhlenbeck, winner of the 2019 Abel prize. With this contribution, the EDGE Foundation established the Karen EDGE Fellowship, which supports mid-career mathematicians in the United States from groups traditionally underrepresented at research institutions in the mathematical sciences. The Fellowship promotes the research productivity and visibility of these mathematicians, providing grants to each Fellow over three years.

    $16,518 spentof which $8,000 as grants
    9% of program spending
  3. Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory in Mathematical Biology. The program is designed to expose advanced graduate students/postdocs in the mathematical sciences to interdisciplinary work in a lab. Through this opportunity, participants learn about a new interdisciplinary research project and potentially start new research collaborations. Participants and mentors engaged in workshops together to promote best collaborative practices. Then, research pairs worked together in person or virtually for one week to kickstart a new research collaboration. In this fiscal year, the research pairs continued their collaborations, and the program leaders created workshop materials for future installations of the project.

    $3,379 spentof which $3,000 as grants
    2% of program spending
  4. Mary Beth Ruskai Fund. This fund was launched as a result of a bequest received in January 2023. Every year, two grants of $5,000 are awarded for a 12-month grant period for professionals in the mathematical sciences to advance their research careers through travel, collaboration, or other activities. The scope of these grants reflects Mary Beth Ruskai's commitment to women and to interdisciplinary work.

    $1,574 spent
    1% of program spending
  5. The EDGE Foundation provided Mathematically Gifted and Black with $5,100 to support rising leaders in the mathematical sciences.

    $5,100 spent
    3% of program spending
  6. Institute for Broadening Participation Transaction. The EDGE Foundation contributed $35 to support the organization's mission to increase diversity in the STEM workforce.

    $35 spentof which $35 as grants
    0% of program spending

The 6 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $174,761.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($78k) Expenses 100 ($66k) Net assets 100 ($252k)2021 Revenue 164 ($128k) Expenses 218 ($143k) Net assets 94 ($236k)2022 Revenue 226 ($176k) Expenses 204 ($134k) Net assets 111 ($278k)2023 Revenue 195 ($152k) Expenses 383 ($252k) Net assets 71 ($179k)2024 Revenue 726 ($567k) Expenses 373 ($246k) Net assets 199 ($500k)2025 Revenue 452 ($353k) Expenses 424 ($279k) Net assets 228 ($574k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (452)Expenses (424)Net assets (228)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $179k to $500k (+180%).

$252k
$236k
$278k
$179k
$500k
$574k
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 19% · 2021 0% · 2022 0% · 2023 0% · 2024 1% · 2025 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

94% of SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (57% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,946 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$12k
’20
−$15k
’21
$42k
’22
−$100k
’23
$321k
’24
$74k
’25
25
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

202020212022202320242025
Listed121313131414
Joined·+2+2+0+1+1
No longer listed·12001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $12k → $223.

2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 30% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 52% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

94% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION.

52%
largest funder
93%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 75% · 2018 100% · 2019 99% · 2020 98% · 2021 98% · 2022 86% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 4 states in all.

IL
SD
RI
VA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’22
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $21k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 16,849 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin21% · above the median
Months of reserve24.7mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)35% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 16,849 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

63% of spending goes to programs.

Program 63%Management 37%Fundraising 0%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

72%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION?
SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $69,149 to it, the largest being AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY ($36,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $69,149 in grants to SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION?
AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY is the largest funder on record, with $36,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SYLVIA BOZEMAN AND RHONDA HUGHES EDGE FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing