Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP

SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,220 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($720). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 59% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$130k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$1k
Net assets
$351k
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Society for the Conservation of Bighorn Sheep does

Mission

Conservation and management of the wild sheep population of california and throughout north america

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. Satellite water monitoringcollect and provide data to california department of fish and wildlife biologists and marine base staff biologist at 29 palms onwater source information received form satellite monitoring systems installed on big game guzzlers.this data is used to determine when water hauling or guzzler repairs are needed. Wildlife water consumption and sheep migration patterns can also be monitored by the water usage at various locations.

    $3,124 spent
    3% of program spending
  2. Area captain program coordinate with california department of fish and wildlife, u.s. Bureauof land management, u.s. Forest service, u.s. Park service, californiastate park service, the us marine corps and volunteers on various projects including installation,repair and maintenance of big game guzzlers and natural springs. Conduct surveys and provide the results to the california department of fish andwildlife for the improvement of wildlife habitat. Coordinate with volunteer areacaptains to inspect and maintain over 60 big game guzzles and various natural springs.there is often little or no expense associated with this program because dedicated volunteers absorb their own travel and other minor expensesthemselves and consider it part of the obligation as sportsmen to improve wildlife habitat.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending
  3. Satellite monitor, new technology all of the existing monitor systems are complex and are expensive equipment that generally requires and experienced technician to install and repair.the society has been experimenting with more modern monitoring systems that can be installed and maintained by volunteers without extensive trainingone such system provided on loan by the manufacture "ranchbot" was installed at no cost and is being tested for its ability to provide the required data.a second system was purchased and installed on the little fargo big game guzzler and is also being tested for accuracy and reliability. This system the "gallagher"is simple to install and made to be simply replaced at the end of its 5 year warranted battery life span.

    $2,544 spent
    2% of program spending
  4. Water hauling to big game guzzlers during dry summer monthswater hauling to the big game guzzlers often becomes necessary when rain water collection does not keep up with water usage by the bighorn sheep and otherdesert wild life. In order to maintain reliable water sources for the animals it often becomes necessary to supplement the rain water collection with water deliveriesduring the dry summer months. Sb 25 newberry big game guzzler receives extremely heavy use by bighorn sheep in the summer month and this year volunteers hauled and delivered 9550 gallons of water to this location. The volunteers traveled over 7553 miles and expended 345 hours of labor to accomplish this task.water was also deliver to sb 50 big game guzzler and sb 52 sawtooth big game guzzler.all of the expenses including fuel for this activity were absorbed by the volunteers themselves as they are dedicated to supporting the big horn sheep and other desertwildlife.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending
  5. Area captain program coordinate with california department of fish and wildlife, u.s. Bureauof land management, u.s. Forest service, u.s. Park service, californiastate park service, the us marine corps and volunteers on various projects including installation,repair and maintenance of big game guzzlers and natural springs. Conduct surveys and provide the results to the california department of fish andwildlife for the improvement of wildlife habitat. Coordinate with volunteer areacaptains to inspect and maintain over 50 big game guzzles and various natural springs.there is often little expense associated with this program because dedicated volunteers absorb their own travel and other minor expensesthemselves and consider it part of the obligation as sportsmen to improve wildlife habitat.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending
  6. Sheep sheet news letter, postage $173.95 , printing $ 442.80print and distribute the sheep sheet news letter that contains informationon wildlife habitat improvement projects both past and future. It is distributed to members and volunteers.

    $617 spent
    1% of program spending
  7. State lands commission / state school lands guzzler sites lease.90 big game guzzler sites are planed for state lands school properties in the mojave desert. The lease was approved in 2024 and work has begun construction the guzzlers.due to the extreme heat in the desert construction by volunteers can only be accomplished in the fall and winter months. The goal of constructing 90 guzzlers will be a multi year project. The sites are being prioritized by the need for water in locations that already have a sheep population with limited water resources.future projects will include more remote areas with the intent of making much of the desert habitable for the big horn sheep.

    $163 spent
    0% of program spending
  8. State lands, big game guzzler projectsthe stale lands project consists of 90 sites leased form the california sate lands commission for the specific purpose of building big game guzzlers at each site invery remote locations in the mojave desert.sl 03, lady lu big game guzzler. The water tanks and rain mats for this project were purchased in 2024 at a cost of $ 33,570.15. The installation was carried out in january of 2025 with volunteers completing the project over a three day period in the east the mojave desert 80 miles east of barstow. There was additional cost for the the installation of the project including the expense of the excavator and operator to install the below ground rain catcher tanks.sl 13, hawkeye big game guzzler. The rain mats for this projects were purchased in 2024 at a cost of $15,015.00. The 2 tanks and installation costs including the excavator and operator were included when the project was installed in october of 2025.due to the long lead time on the manufacture of the rain catcher water storage tanks and the limited availability of the hypalon rain mate material supplies for the2026 state lands projects were ordered ahead so they would be available for…

    $115,100 spent
    94% of program spending
  9. State school lands granite/ weavornoy big game guzzler leasecurrently there is one, two and one half acre site with an existing guzzler that has been leased by scbs and it is monitoredand maintained by scbs volunteers with results being reported to department of fish and wildlife biologists.the site is located in the granite mountains in riverside county.the site is located in the granite mountains in riverside county.

    $239 spent
    0% of program spending
  10. Bristol mountains, orange blossum mine pit cover.a local mine owner located in the bristol mountains notified scbs that he had discover and old abandon mine shaft that did not belong to him and that the pitcontained the remains of a bighorn sheep and several desert tortoises that had fallen into the shaft and could not get out. The mine shaft was located on bureau of landmanagement property so the california department of fish and wildlife and the blm were notified of the hazard. Due to the immediate danger for desert wild life the Society for the Conservation of Bighorn Sheep volunteers worked with the two government agencies to immediately build a temporary exclosure over the pit to keep the various species of wildlife from falling in and perishing from the fall or becoming trapped in the deep pit.the blm will eventually replace the temporary structure with a permeant barrier but for the interim the hazard has been resolved.

    $347 spent
    0% of program spending
  11. Fay dee big game guzzler repairthe rain mat and plumbing at the fay dee guzzler had be damaged by very high winds that lifted sections of the mat and portions of the 4" collection pipe thatbrings rain water from the mat to the storage tanks. Volunteers form scbs and the california department of fish and wildlife were able to remove damaged portionsof the mat and restore and older mat in its place. The material is heavy and is on a very steep incline so a lot of had work was involved to complete the repair .most of the damaged piping was salvaged and only a few fitting were required for the repair.

    $72 spent
    0% of program spending
  12. York fire, sb 43 big game guzzler tank replacementthe york fire started in the new york mountains inside mojave preserve and burned for 23 days consuming 93,078 acres of vegetation also damaged was anan old style above ground tank that supplied water for the sheep and other indigenous wildlife. The rain mat and drinker had not been damaged so volunteers removed the damaged tank and installed a new below ground rain catcher tank and reinstalled the existing pluming to the water collection rain mat.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 12 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $122,206.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($54k) Expenses 100 ($38k) Net assets 100 ($221k)2018 Revenue 172 ($93k) Expenses 178 ($68k) Net assets 111 ($246k)2020 Revenue 145 ($79k) Expenses 166 ($63k) Net assets 161 ($356k)2021 Revenue 100 ($54k) Expenses 133 ($51k) Net assets 163 ($359k)2022 Revenue 158 ($86k) Expenses 197 ($75k) Net assets 168 ($370k)2023 Revenue 179 ($97k) Expenses 66 ($25k) Net assets 200 ($442k)2024 Revenue 120 ($65k) Expenses 380 ($145k) Net assets 164 ($362k)2025 Revenue 240 ($130k) Expenses 371 ($142k) Net assets 159 ($351k)
'17'18'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (240)Expenses (371)Net assets (159)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $442k to $362k (−18%).

$221k
$246k
$356k
$359k
$370k
$442k
$362k
$351k
'17'18'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

86% of SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,042 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$16k
’17
$25k
’18
$16k
’20
$3k
’21
$11k
’22
$72k
’23
−$80k
’24
−$11k
’25
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2022 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $370 → $350.

Funder
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
1
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 59% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 59% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP.

59%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

59% of SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $500 that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from California funders.

CA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $720 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP has grown faster than half of the 3,693 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−9% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,693 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

89%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP?
SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,220 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($720). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 59% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $1,220 in grants to SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $720 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SOCIETY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIGHORN SHEEP find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Society for the Conservation of Bighorn Sheep →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing