Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION

NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION (California) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $626,073 to it, the largest being THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ($626,073). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$1.4M
Funders on record
1
Grants received
$626k
Net assets
$32M
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 9%
01What it does

What Natural Communities Coalition does

Mission

To encourage preservation, enhancement and restoration of natural resources within the designed reserve through interaction with the public agencies, conservation-oriented organizations, property owners and the interested public.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Monitoring coordination - the annual monitoring of species and natural communities of the reserve is the way ncc measures the success of land management actions and impacts of public recreation, and how it tracks the ecological health of species for which nroc was established. In addition to ongoing ecological monitoring efforts, ncc conducted two focused target bird species monitoring efforts - california gnatcatcher and coastal cactus wren across the reserve. Additionally, ncc completed a reserve-wide monitoring effort resulting in a reclassification of vegetation communities.

    $1,110,947 spent
    51% of program spending
  2. Restoration and enhancement - working with landowners and land managers that make up the more than 37,000 acre nature reserve of orange county (nroc), ncc conducted a series of workshops introducing these participating members into the effective use of a newly revised habitat restoration and enhancement plan developed by ncc. The multiple year workshop will result in the restoration of 50 acres of coastal sage srub (css) and the skills learned will promote additional acres of the habitat restoration across nroc. Efforts further benefit the three target species and 31 additional species identified in the natural community conservation plan (nccp) and habitat conservation plan (hcp) which are the science underpinnings of nroc.

    $1,033,986 spent
    47% of program spending
  3. Cowbird trapping - ncc continued its annual obligation to trap brownheaded cowbird to manage their impacts on protected bird species. Cowbirds are brood parasites. Female cowbirds lay their eggs in the nest of other native birds. The species to which the nest belongs unknowingly raise the cowbird chick often to the detriment of their own chicks. In areas where cowbird populations are high, traps are used to lower their numbers and increase reproductive and fledgling success of bird species parasitized by cowbirds. A total of nearly one dozen traps were deployed for a total of more than 2,400 trapdays in the reserve where cowbird impacts on protected songbirds are potentially high.

    $39,547 spent
    2% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,184,480.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.2M) Expenses 100 ($1.5M) Net assets 100 ($28M)2018 Revenue 433 ($5.3M) Expenses 132 ($2.0M) Net assets 105 ($29M)2019 Revenue 134 ($1.6M) Expenses 131 ($1.9M) Net assets 103 ($29M)2020 Revenue 105 ($1.3M) Expenses 136 ($2.0M) Net assets 102 ($29M)2021 Revenue 94 ($1.1M) Expenses 105 ($1.6M) Net assets 116 ($32M)2022 Revenue 102 ($1.2M) Expenses 127 ($1.9M) Net assets 95 ($27M)2023 Revenue 92 ($1.1M) Expenses 135 ($2.0M) Net assets 101 ($28M)2024 Revenue 123 ($1.5M) Expenses 151 ($2.2M) Net assets 114 ($32M)2025 Revenue 112 ($1.4M) Expenses 178 ($2.6M) Net assets 116 ($32M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (112)Expenses (178)Net assets (116)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $33M to $27M (−17%).

$28M
$30M
$29M
$29M
$33M
$27M
$29M
$32M
$33M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 8% · 2018 2% · 2019 19% · 2020 42% · 2021 12% · 2022 23% · 2023 14% · 2024 14% · 2025 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

1% of NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 8 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$265k
’17
$3.3M
’18
−$315k
’19
−$736k
’20
−$416k
’21
−$644k
’22
−$887k
’23
−$734k
’24
−$1.3M
’25
5.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

James Sulentich

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed151414141315171616
Joined·+2+0+2+0+5+6+0+2
No longer listed·30213412
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $18k → $70k.

Funder
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $626k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION is better cushioned than half of the 1,074 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−93% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.6mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,074 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 17%Fundraising 0%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

17%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION?
NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION (California) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $626,073 to it, the largest being THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ($626,073). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $626,073 in grants to NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION?
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY is the largest funder on record, with $626,073 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NATURAL COMMUNITIES COALITION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Natural Communities Coalition →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 1 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing