Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Washington · Nonprofit

SEEEDS

SEEEDS (Washington) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $404,923 to it, the largest being AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ($216,620). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 84% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$209k
Revenue FY2025
4
Funders on record
$405k
Grants received
$423k
Net assets
3/4 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year

Against its field

SEEEDS runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 15,926 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin61% · top quartile
Months of reserve62.4mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15,926 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($148k) Expenses 100 ($73k) Net assets 100 ($80k)2019 Revenue 78 ($116k) Expenses 79 ($58k) Net assets 172 ($138k)2020 Revenue 53 ($78k) Expenses 76 ($56k) Net assets 201 ($161k)2021 Revenue 30 ($45k) Expenses 72 ($53k) Net assets 191 ($153k)2022 Revenue 107 ($158k) Expenses 104 ($76k) Net assets 293 ($235k)2023 Revenue 71 ($105k) Expenses 115 ($84k) Net assets 319 ($256k)2024 Revenue 97 ($144k) Expenses 143 ($105k) Net assets 368 ($295k)2025 Revenue 141 ($209k) Expenses 111 ($81k) Net assets 528 ($423k)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (141)Expenses (111)Net assets (528)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of SEEEDS’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (58% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,851 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$75k
18
$58k
19
$23k
20
$8k
21
$82k
22
$21k
23
$39k
24
$128k
25
62
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose $61k → $116k.

Funder
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
2
1
3
1
3
2
2
1

3 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)84% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SEEEDS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SEEEDS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 53% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

84% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SEEEDS.

53%
largest funder
99%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 57% · 2019 100% · 2020 49% · 2021 100% · 2022 46% · 2023 82%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

84% of SEEEDS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $65k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Washington, across 1 state.

NJ

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
19
20
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $340k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like SEEEDS

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SEEEDS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SEEEDS?
SEEEDS (Washington) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $404,923 to it, the largest being AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ($216,620). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 84% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SEEEDS have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $404,923 in grants to SEEEDS, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SEEEDS?
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $216,620 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SEEEDS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing