Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Ohio · Nonprofit

SECONDHAND MUTTS

SECONDHAND MUTTS (Ohio) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $105,607 to it, the largest being THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION ($73,250). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 79% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$37k
Revenue FY2023
6
Funders on record
$106k
Grants received
$154k
Net assets
4/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 50%

Against its field

SECONDHAND MUTTS runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 4,809 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin29% · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−8% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,809 animals nonprofits under $100k, FY2023

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($62k) Expenses 100 ($78k) Net assets 100 ($35k)2018 Revenue 140 ($87k) Expenses 107 ($84k) Net assets 107 ($37k)2019 Revenue 157 ($97k) Expenses 88 ($69k) Net assets 187 ($65k)2020 Revenue 145 ($89k) Expenses 73 ($57k) Net assets 279 ($97k)2021 Revenue 80 ($49k) Expenses 33 ($26k) Net assets 345 ($120k)2022 Revenue 110 ($68k) Expenses 57 ($45k) Net assets 411 ($144k)2023 Revenue 61 ($37k) Expenses 34 ($26k) Net assets 442 ($154k)
2017201820192020202120222023
Revenue (61)Expenses (34)Net assets (442)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

90% of SECONDHAND MUTTS’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 6,568 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$17k
17
$2k
18
$28k
19
$32k
20
$23k
21
$23k
22
$11k
23
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $3k → $19k.

3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)80% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SECONDHAND MUTTS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SECONDHAND MUTTS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 69% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

79% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SECONDHAND MUTTS.

69%
largest funder
96%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 80% · 2019 91% · 2020 52% · 2021 75% · 2022 75% · 2023 80%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

79% of SECONDHAND MUTTS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $22k that is directly attributable, 98% of it comes from Ohio funders.

OH
NJ

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Ohio out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $84k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like SECONDHAND MUTTS

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ohio

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OH

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SECONDHAND MUTTS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SECONDHAND MUTTS?
SECONDHAND MUTTS (Ohio) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $105,607 to it, the largest being THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION ($73,250). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 79% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SECONDHAND MUTTS have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $105,607 in grants to SECONDHAND MUTTS, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SECONDHAND MUTTS?
THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $73,250 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SECONDHAND MUTTS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2017–2023), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing