Skip to content

South Carolina · Nonprofit

Save Our Saluda

Save Our Saluda (South Carolina) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $37,130 to it, the largest being DUKE ENERGY FOUNDATION ($20,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$200k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$37k
Net assets
$33k
3/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 26%
01What it does

What Save Our Saluda does

Mission

To protect and restore the upper saluda watershed through education, community awareness, advocacy, and seeking solutions to threats to the saluda river and its tributaries

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Project Management & Consulting on the below conservation initiatives

    $128,789 spent
    40% of program spending
  2. Ledford-Railroad Creek Cattle Crossing, Watering Facilities, Fencing, and Streambank, Road, and Drainage Stabilization Project: Streambank grading and installation of boulder toe rock (160 ft), Installation of 2 in-stream rock vane structures, Streambank seeding and coir matting, Live staking and plugs planted on lower streambank slopes, Watering facilities (well rehabilitation, water lines, 2 heavy use areas with watering troughs, Fencing (1,800 feet), Road and drainage stabilization (835 feet) and culverts (3), 5 Rock lined waterways (2,904 ft2)

    $67,948 spentof which $67,527 as grants
    21% of program spending
  3. Walker- North Saluda Streambank and Farm Road Stabilization Project: Streambank grading and installation of boulder toe rock (160 ft), Installation of three in-stream boulder j-hook structures, Streambank seeding and coir matting, Live staking, native bare roots, and plugs planted on streambank slopes, Containerized native trees and shrubs in planted riparian buffer, Two rock lined waterways constructed (2,625 ft2), Stabilized of farm access roads (~2,300 feet)

    $62,476 spentof which $62,225 as grants
    19% of program spending
  4. OTHER PROGRAM SERVICES 4: Contribution to Other conservation efforts OTHER PROGRAM SERVICES 5: Direct Overhead & office expenses associated with below activities. Payment processing fees, office supplies, travel, Printing OTHER PROGRAM SERVICES 6: Project Management & Consulting on the below conservation initiatives

    $61,835 spentof which $57,917 as grants
    19% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $321,048.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($29k) Expenses 100 ($13k) Net assets 100 ($25k)2018 Revenue 269 ($78k) Expenses 687 ($89k) Net assets 57 ($14k)2020 Revenue 1039 ($302k) Expenses 1841 ($240k) Net assets 372 ($94k)2021 Revenue 1276 ($371k) Expenses 3202 ($417k) Net assets 191 ($48k)2022 Revenue 515 ($150k) Expenses 914 ($119k) Net assets 314 ($79k)2023 Revenue 1110 ($323k) Expenses 2526 ($329k) Net assets 291 ($74k)2024 Revenue 687 ($200k) Expenses 1838 ($239k) Net assets 131 ($33k)
2017201820202021202220232024
Revenue (687)Expenses (1838)Net assets (131)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $94k to $48k (−49%).

$25k
$14k
$94k
$48k
$79k
$73k
$34k
2017201820202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 34% · 2021 67% · 2022 45% · 2023 68% · 2024 87%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of Save Our Saluda’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$16k
’17
−$11k
’18
$63k
’20
−$46k
’21
$31k
’22
−$6k
’23
−$39k
’24
1.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

20202021202220232024
Listed97789
Joined·+1+0+1+1
No longer listed·3000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $8k → $25.

1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Save Our Saluda’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Save Our Saluda leans on a few funders — its largest provides 54% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

38% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Save Our Saluda.

54%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 99% · 2021 100% · 2022 68% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Save Our Saluda draws 92% of its grant income from funders outside South Carolina, across 3 states in all.

NC
SC
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
South Carolina out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $80 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Save Our Saluda has grown faster than three-quarters of the 4,264 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−20% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.5mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)32% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,264 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like Save Our Saluda

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In South Carolina

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

98% of spending goes to programs.

Program 98%Management 2%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
78%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

91%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

SC

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Save Our Saluda: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Save Our Saluda?
Save Our Saluda (South Carolina) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $37,130 to it, the largest being DUKE ENERGY FOUNDATION ($20,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Save Our Saluda have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $37,130 in grants to Save Our Saluda, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Save Our Saluda?
DUKE ENERGY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $20,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Save Our Saluda find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing