Loading…
Loading…
South Dakota · Nonprofit
SANFORD CLINIC (South Dakota) is funded by 6 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $2,478,220 in grants to it, the largest being CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ($10,486,917). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
From the IRS filings of SANFORD CLINIC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
SANFORD CLINIC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 59% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
SANFORD CLINIC draws 63% of its grant income from funders outside South Dakota — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 4 states in all.
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023, and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing