Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Texas · Nonprofit

RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY

RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY (Texas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $277,877 to it, the largest being Communities Foundation of Texas Inc ($170,706). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$174k
Revenue FY2025
7
Funders on record
$278k
Grants received
$137k
Net assets
4/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 54%

Against its field

RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,307 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin29% · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,307 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($72k) Expenses 100 ($95k) Net assets 100 ($22k)2018 Revenue 130 ($94k) Expenses 91 ($86k) Net assets 137 ($30k)2019 Revenue 122 ($88k) Expenses 59 ($57k) Net assets 281 ($61k)2020 Revenue 176 ($127k) Expenses 86 ($82k) Net assets 486 ($106k)2021 Revenue 142 ($103k) Expenses 129 ($122k) Net assets 398 ($87k)2022 Revenue 114 ($82k) Expenses 113 ($108k) Net assets 289 ($63k)2023 Revenue 149 ($108k) Expenses 111 ($106k) Net assets 298 ($65k)2024 Revenue 183 ($132k) Expenses 115 ($109k) Net assets 401 ($88k)2025 Revenue 241 ($174k) Expenses 131 ($124k) Net assets 628 ($137k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (241)Expenses (131)Net assets (628)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

89% of RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,013 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$23k
17
$8k
18
$31k
19
$45k
20
$19k
21
$25k
22
$2k
23
$23k
24
$50k
25
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 3 funders, grant income fell $39k → $30k.

6 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 61% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY.

61%
largest funder
97%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 61% · 2018 53% · 2019 53% · 2020 61% · 2021 65% · 2022 54% · 2023 64%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $210 that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Texas funders.

TX

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $278k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

64%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY?
RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY (Texas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $277,877 to it, the largest being Communities Foundation of Texas Inc ($170,706). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $277,877 in grants to RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY?
Communities Foundation of Texas Inc is the largest funder on record, with $170,706 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RICHARDSON HUMANE SOCIETY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing