Skip to content

Virginia · Nonprofit

REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC

REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC (Virginia) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,349 to it, the largest being Rochester Institute of Technology ($6,400). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$4.3M
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$10k
Net assets
$2.8M
1/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf Inc does

Mission

The registry of interpreters for the deaf, inc. Is a professional organization for practitioners committed to providing ethical, high-quality signed and spoken language interpreting services.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Certification: ) rid's certification program is responsible for conferring national certification to practitioners engaging in the provision of sign language interpretation. Certification is part of the triad of credentialed practitioner oversight processes established and followed by the association. The certification program awards credentials to individuals who have demonstrated achievement of minimum competencies. An individual's certification is maintained by maintaining an active annual membership with rid and earning sufficient continuing education hours every four years. At the end of fy2025, there were 9,392 individuals holding rid certification.

    $329,595 spent$39,611 earned by the program
    12% of program spending
  2. Meetings: rid holds a biennial conference where members and stakeholders participate in the association's business meeting. Additionally, continuing education workshops, research presentations and other professional development opportunities for the interpreting profession are offered. In fy2025, rid did not host a national conference.

    $100,270 spent
    4% of program spending
  3. Member services: rid supports practitioners in the sign language interpreting and transliterating field by offering an array of benefits, including professional practice papers, volunteer leadership opportunities, discounts on testing, conference and publications, and continuing education workshops. Member services also provides support and resources for rid's national affiliate chapter network. At the end of fy2025, there were 12,142 paid members across seven (7) membership categories.

    $489,569 spent$1,208,542 earned by the program
    17% of program spending
  4. Publications: rid press publishes select interpreting resources for practitioners in the field. These publications support professional development, provide exam preparation material, and spread awareness about the sign language interpreting profession. They include: an annual scholarly e-publication, the "journal of interpretation," which publishes academic research papers in the field of interpreting; and 16 published titles currently sold in the rid bookstore.

    $121,393 spent$72,535 earned by the program
    4% of program spending
  5. Ethical practices system (eps): the eps program provides an avenue of accountability for both consumers of interpreting services and fellow practitioners who have concerns about holders of rid's certification credential and their adherence to rid's code of professional conduct (cpc). The program supports the review and resolution of ethics complaints through established policies and procedures designed to uphold processional standards and maintain public trust in the profession. The eps is part of the triad of credentialed practitioner oversight processes established and followed by the association. In fy2025, there were 107 complaints and 9 reports received, plus 35 carry-over complaints from fy2024. A total of 151 cases were handled in fy2025.

    $206,420 spent$327,127 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  6. Professional development (education): the certification maintenance program (cmp) serves as a mechanism to track earned continuing education units for the purpose of maintaining rid certification, ensuring practitioners maintain up to date interpreting skills. This program is part of the triad of credentialed practitioner oversight processes established and followed by the association. Credentialed practitioners must maintain their certification through a four-year cycle of earning continuing education hours, currently set at 8.0 units (80 contact hours.)

    $197,920 spent$420,049 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  7. Other: other programs and services provided by rid include a communications department, a quarterly member publication called the views; a government affairs and public policy and advocacy program (ppa); and volunteer governance bodies, such as the board of directors and a slate of committees, task forces and councils. The communications department manages rid's social media engagement and public relations functions, and conducts communications with the membership and external stakeholders via newsletters, e-mail campaigns and press releases. Communications and views expenses $198,993. Including grants of $ 0. Revenue $8,230. The government affairs and public policy and advocacy program interacts with government agencies to monitor legislative developments and advocate for the interests of practitioners and end users. Ppa expenses $191,053. Including grants of $ 0. Revenue $326,381. Rid's volunteer governance bodies carry out the work of the association by providing high-level strategic governance and oversight of the association and engaging in fundraising and donor relations. Board-related expenses $180,562.12. Including grants of $ 0. Revenue $0.

    $570,608 spent$326,381 earned by the program
    20% of program spending
  8. Casli: the center for the assessment of sign language interpretation (casli) is a single-member llc owned by rid and set up for the purpose of developing, maintaining, and administering interpreter knowledge and performance exams for the purpose of attaining rid certification. Casli's revenue primarily consists of exam registration fees. Including a contribution for expenses borne by rid of $270,126

    $783,500 spent$913,669 earned by the program
    28% of program spending

The 8 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,799,275.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.8M) Expenses 100 ($2.3M) Net assets 100 ($712k)2018 Revenue 106 ($3.0M) Expenses 107 ($2.4M) Net assets 177 ($1.3M)2019 Revenue 109 ($3.1M) Expenses 111 ($2.5M) Net assets 250 ($1.8M)2020 Revenue 114 ($3.2M) Expenses 124 ($2.8M) Net assets 304 ($2.2M)2021 Revenue 105 ($3.0M) Expenses 120 ($2.7M) Net assets 337 ($2.4M)2022 Revenue 116 ($3.3M) Expenses 134 ($3.1M) Net assets 364 ($2.6M)2023 Revenue 106 ($3.0M) Expenses 147 ($3.4M) Net assets 312 ($2.2M)2024 Revenue 132 ($3.7M) Expenses 181 ($4.1M) Net assets 271 ($1.9M)2025 Revenue 154 ($4.3M) Expenses 154 ($3.5M) Net assets 388 ($2.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (154)Expenses (154)Net assets (388)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $4.1M to $4.9M (+22%).

$3.3M
$4.1M
$4.9M
$4.8M
$5.5M
$5.5M
$5.6M
$5.0M
$5.8M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 10%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

0% of REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,611 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$541k
’17
$546k
’18
$525k
’19
$386k
’20
$225k
’21
$213k
’22
−$375k
’23
−$399k
’24
$832k
’25
16
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed171313141824141617
Joined·+6+1+6+4+11+1+4+6
No longer listed·1015051125
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $1k → $6k.

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 62% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

66% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC.

62%
largest funder
96%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 99% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Virginia, across 3 states in all.

IL
NY
CT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’23
Virginia out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $449 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 4,665 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin19% · top quartile
Months of reserve16.3mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,665 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Virginia

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 19%Fundraising 1%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 2 states

CA
VA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Center for the Assessment of Sign Language Interpretation LLC (Casli) · disregarded

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC?
REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC (Virginia) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,349 to it, the largest being Rochester Institute of Technology ($6,400). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $10,349 in grants to REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC?
Rochester Institute of Technology is the largest funder on record, with $6,400 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing