Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

California · Nonprofit

Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation

Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $176,163 to it, the largest being PASO ROBLES DESTINATION DBA TRAVEL PASO ($171,125). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year. Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation administers funds for other donors, so those contributions arrive into funds it holds rather than supporting a program it runs itself.

$553k
Revenue FY2024
3
Funders on record
$176k
Grants received
$1.9M
Net assets
2/3 repeat funders

Hosts funds for others

Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation administers funds on behalf of other donors. The grants recorded as coming in are contributions into those funds, so they count custody rather than support for a programRecreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation runs itself. This page therefore states the flows and does not draw the comparisons it would draw for an operating charity: concentration, funder retention, grant dependency and the peer field are all left out, because each of them would read a vehicle as if it were a program.

Paid out

$17k

Recipients

0

Contributions on record

$176k

Donors on record

3

Payments out are 0.10x the contributions on record, so the balance accumulates rather than passing straight through.

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($522k) Expenses 100 ($234k) Net assets 100 ($1.9M)2018 Revenue 41 ($215k) Expenses 93 ($217k) Net assets 103 ($2.0M)2019 Revenue 44 ($232k) Expenses 109 ($254k) Net assets 101 ($1.9M)2020 Revenue 30 ($158k) Expenses 114 ($267k) Net assets 96 ($1.8M)2021 Revenue 37 ($192k) Expenses 28 ($67k) Net assets 102 ($2.0M)2022 Revenue 46 ($239k) Expenses 80 ($188k) Net assets 105 ($2.0M)2023 Revenue 50 ($263k) Expenses 69 ($163k) Net assets 110 ($2.1M)2024 Revenue 106 ($553k) Expenses 313 ($733k) Net assets 101 ($1.9M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (106)Expenses (313)Net assets (101)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$288k
17
$2k
18
$22k
19
$109k
20
$126k
21
$51k
22
$100k
23
$180k
24
8.9
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2022 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $52k → $58k.

Funder
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
2
3
1
1

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation's grant income comes from California funders.

CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

22
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $38 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

99% of spending goes to programs.

Program 99%Management 1%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

7%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation?
Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $176,163 to it, the largest being PASO ROBLES DESTINATION DBA TRAVEL PASO ($171,125). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year. Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation administers funds for other donors, so those contributions arrive into funds it holds rather than supporting a program it runs itself.
How many funders does Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $176,163 in grants to Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation?
PASO ROBLES DESTINATION DBA TRAVEL PASO is the largest funder on record, with $171,125 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Recreation Enhances Community Foundation REC Foundation find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing