Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

Raze Development

Raze Development (Washington) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $897,286 to it, the largest being EMPIRE HEALTH FOUNDATION ($509,286). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$864k
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$897k
Net assets
$1.3M
4/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 90%
01What it does

What Raze Development does

Mission

Raze Early Learning and Development Center demolishes the divisive and traumatic current narrative of the black student in education. Raze Early Learning and Development Center prioritizes family engagement and partnership by first acknowledging the parent as the cornerstone teacher. Secondly, by addressing Maslow's Hierarchy of needs-through community partnership and resources we ensure that our students are in optimal positions to reach their full potential. Through onsite culturally based mental and behavioral health supports we address the mental health disparities that students living in historically marginalized communities face. We provide culturally immersive, individualized curriculum and instruction that validates and affirms black culture. We employ culturally responsive teaching strategies that create psychologically safe environments, fosters understanding of differences, establishes self-worth and builds self-esteem, as well as create attainable high standards for our stu

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Conducting study groups, and research for a culturally appropriate child care setting.

    $83,110 spent
    63% of program spending
  2. Fiscal Sponsorship of small soon to be nonprofit organizations.

    $49,000 spent$49,000 earned by the program
    37% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $132,110.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2023, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2023, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20232023 Revenue 100 ($697k) Expenses 100 ($208k) Net assets 100 ($512k)2024 Revenue 124 ($864k) Expenses 68 ($141k) Net assets 245 ($1.3M)
20232024
Revenue (124)Expenses (68)Net assets (245)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $1.4M to $2.3M (+64%).

$1.4M
$2.3M
20232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2024 75%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of Raze Development’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (57% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,946 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.

$490k
’23
$723k
’24
34
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Walter Kendricks

Chairman

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

20232024
Listed66
Joined·+0
No longer listed·0
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2021 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $25k → $627k.

Funder
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
$165k
Cardea Servicesunclassified
$25k
funders
1
3
3
5
1

2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 19% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Raze Development’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Raze Development leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 88%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

43% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Raze Development.

57%
largest funder
88%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 100% · 2022 47% · 2023 72% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of Raze Development's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $174k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Raze Development runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 22,812 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin84% · top quartile
Months of reserve34.2mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)24% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 22,812 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like Raze Development

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

94% of spending goes to programs.

Program 94%Management 6%Fundraising 0%

Governance

6
board members
83%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

0%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Little Scholars Development Center · corp_trust

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Raze Development: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Raze Development?
Raze Development (Washington) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $897,286 to it, the largest being EMPIRE HEALTH FOUNDATION ($509,286). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Raze Development have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $897,286 in grants to Raze Development, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Raze Development?
EMPIRE HEALTH FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $509,286 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Raze Development find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Raze Development →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2023–2024), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing