Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Pennsylvania · Nonprofit

RADNOR CONSERVANCY

RADNOR CONSERVANCY (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $114,249 to it, the largest being THE CHANTICLEER FOUNDATION ($26,000). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$66k
Revenue FY2024
12
Funders on record
$114k
Grants received
$263k
Net assets
8/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 32%

Against its field

RADNOR CONSERVANCY has grown faster than half of the 3,146 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−23% · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−4% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,146 environment nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($85k) Expenses 100 ($55k) Net assets 100 ($168k)2018 Revenue 101 ($87k) Expenses 109 ($60k) Net assets 116 ($195k)2019 Revenue 101 ($86k) Expenses 151 ($82k) Net assets 118 ($199k)2020 Revenue 65 ($56k) Expenses 125 ($68k) Net assets 111 ($186k)2021 Revenue 112 ($96k) Expenses 129 ($70k) Net assets 126 ($212k)2022 Revenue 153 ($131k) Expenses 146 ($80k) Net assets 156 ($263k)2023 Revenue 102 ($87k) Expenses 131 ($72k) Net assets 166 ($278k)2024 Revenue 77 ($66k) Expenses 148 ($81k) Net assets 157 ($263k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (77)Expenses (148)Net assets (157)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

99% of RADNOR CONSERVANCY’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (92% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,973 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$31k
17
$27k
18
$4k
19
$13k
20
$26k
21
$51k
22
$16k
23
$15k
24
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $5k → $28k.

4 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)42% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of RADNOR CONSERVANCY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RADNOR CONSERVANCY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 23% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

42% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RADNOR CONSERVANCY.

23%
largest funder
60%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 80% · 2018 63% · 2019 100% · 2020 50% · 2021 44% · 2022 38% · 2023 36%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of RADNOR CONSERVANCY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

95% of RADNOR CONSERVANCY's grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.

PA
CA
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Pennsylvania out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $49k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 12 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like RADNOR CONSERVANCY

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Pennsylvania

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

89%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

PA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RADNOR CONSERVANCY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RADNOR CONSERVANCY?
RADNOR CONSERVANCY (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $114,249 to it, the largest being THE CHANTICLEER FOUNDATION ($26,000). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does RADNOR CONSERVANCY have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $114,249 in grants to RADNOR CONSERVANCY, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RADNOR CONSERVANCY?
THE CHANTICLEER FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $26,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RADNOR CONSERVANCY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 12funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing