Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

PTA TEXAS CONGRESS

PTA TEXAS CONGRESS (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,258 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($1,217). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 97% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2026
$74k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$1k
Net assets
$57k
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What PTA Texas Congress does

Mission

Education and support of Fern Bluff Elementary students and families.

As stated on its FY2026 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. School Services- Campus Initiatives, Curriculum Enhancements, Field Trips, Library, Music, STAAR Support, Science Lab/Kits, Staff Appreciation, Teacher Fund, Workroom, Community Garden/Courtyard, Subscriptions, Other

    $53,353 spent
    74% of program spending
  2. Parent and Student Services- Book Fair Vouchers, Geography Superstar, Family Social Events, Fifth Grade Graduation, Fine Arts, Healthy Lifestyles, Hospitality, Science, Math Superstar, Reflections

    $8,476 spent
    12% of program spending
  3. Community Service- RRHS Scholarship for former FBE student

    $1,620 spent
    2% of program spending
  4. Participation Programs- Watch DOG Dads, Math Pentathlon

    $9,103 spent
    13% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $72,552.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($45k) Expenses 100 ($52k) Net assets 100 ($35k)2018 Revenue 81 ($36k) Expenses 88 ($46k) Net assets 72 ($25k)2019 Revenue 119 ($54k) Expenses 115 ($60k) Net assets 53 ($18k)2022 Revenue 141 ($63k) Expenses 43 ($22k) Net assets 145 ($50k)2023 Revenue 149 ($67k) Expenses 93 ($49k) Net assets 198 ($68k)2024 Revenue 161 ($72k) Expenses 155 ($81k) Net assets 172 ($60k)2025 Revenue 159 ($72k) Expenses 138 ($72k) Net assets 171 ($59k)2026 Revenue 164 ($74k) Expenses 145 ($76k) Net assets 165 ($57k)
'17'18'19'22'23'24'25'26
Revenue (164)Expenses (145)Net assets (165)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $50k to $68k (+36%).

$35k
$25k
$18k
$50k
$68k
$60k
$59k
$57k
'17'18'19'22'23'24'25'26
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$7k
’17
−$10k
’18
−$7k
’19
$41k
’22
$18k
’23
−$9k
’24
−$707
’25
−$2k
’26
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $217 → $292.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
1
1
1
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 97% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PTA TEXAS CONGRESS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PTA TEXAS CONGRESS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 97% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

97% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PTA TEXAS CONGRESS.

97%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

97% of PTA TEXAS CONGRESS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $41 that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Texas, across 1 state.

NC

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like PTA TEXAS CONGRESS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

TX

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PTA TEXAS CONGRESS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PTA TEXAS CONGRESS?
PTA TEXAS CONGRESS (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,258 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($1,217). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 97% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PTA TEXAS CONGRESS have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $1,258 in grants to PTA TEXAS CONGRESS, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PTA TEXAS CONGRESS?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,217 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PTA TEXAS CONGRESS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds PTA Texas Congress →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2026 (financials across 2017–2026), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing