Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Texas · Nonprofit

PTA Texas Congress

PTA Texas Congress (Texas) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,600 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($920). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 57% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$54k
Revenue FY2025
4
Funders on record
$2k
Grants received
$23k
Net assets
2/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 3%

Against its field

PTA Texas Congress runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 16,609 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin32% · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−10% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 16,609 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($102k) Expenses 100 ($115k) Net assets 100 ($12k)2020 Revenue 80 ($81k) Expenses 65 ($75k) Net assets 158 ($19k)2021 Revenue 50 ($51k) Expenses 30 ($35k) Net assets 297 ($35k)2022 Revenue 35 ($36k) Expenses 29 ($34k) Net assets 316 ($37k)2023 Revenue 25 ($25k) Expenses 36 ($41k) Net assets 183 ($21k)2024 Revenue 38 ($38k) Expenses 33 ($38k) Net assets 183 ($21k)2025 Revenue 53 ($54k) Expenses 32 ($37k) Net assets 192 ($23k)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (53)Expenses (32)Net assets (192)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of PTA Texas Congress’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (65% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 26,667 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$13k
19
$7k
20
$16k
21
$2k
22
$16k
23
$0
24
$17k
25
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose $147 → $773.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
2
2
1
2
1

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)57% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PTA Texas Congress’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PTA Texas Congress leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

57% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PTA Texas Congress.

57%
largest funder
97%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 73% · 2021 85% · 2022 100% · 2023 71%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

57% of PTA Texas Congress's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $680 that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Texas, across 3 states.

NY
MA
PA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

20
21
23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $920 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like PTA Texas Congress

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

TX

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PTA Texas Congress: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PTA Texas Congress?
PTA Texas Congress (Texas) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,600 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($920). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 57% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PTA Texas Congress have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $1,600 in grants to PTA Texas Congress, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PTA Texas Congress?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $920 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PTA Texas Congress find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing