Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

PROJECT 619

PROJECT 619 (Washington) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $221,639 to it, the largest being M J MURDOCK CHARITABLE TRUST ($94,500). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2022
$108k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$222k
Net assets
$0
4/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 28%
01What it does

What Project 619 does

Mission

Project six19 is not a putrity movement. Rather, we are a movement designed to empower people to live out relationships in a way which brings true life, centered on christ.

As stated on its FY2022 Form 990.

Program

  1. Project six19 exists to promote biblical sexuality through culturally relevant education and initiatives. A holistic approach is used while recognizing that a growing relationship with jesus christ involves the renewal of the whole person. A growing love relationship with jesus christ is critical for spiritual, physical, mental and social health. Thus, we engage culture to understand it and equip ourselves with the knowledge to speak truth into the current culture by intentionally creating environments that utilize space, time, community and technology. It is important that we enter into community and work with other organizations whose vision and values align with those of project six19. We believe in finding innovative ways to communicate our message by allowing for opportunities to manifest themselves through an organic approach. We will earn the right to be heard by being sensitive to the ethnic, racial, socioeconomic and religious backgrounds of our audiences.on january 25, 2022, the board of directors voted to cease ministry operations effective february 1, 2022.on january 27, 2022, the chairman of the board notified the two final employees that the ministry was closing and…

    $162,699 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2021 Form 990. Program spending in total: $162,699.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($195k) Expenses 100 ($198k) Net assets 100 ($5k)2019 Revenue 112 ($218k) Expenses 103 ($204k) Net assets 699 ($32k)2020 Revenue 112 ($219k) Expenses 108 ($213k) Net assets 826 ($38k)2021 Revenue 215 ($419k) Expenses 167 ($331k) Net assets 2740 ($125k)2022 Revenue 55 ($108k) Expenses 117 ($233k) Net assets 0 ($0)
20182019202020212022
Revenue (55)Expenses (117)Net assets (0)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $166k to $0 (−100%).

$26k
$43k
$79k
$166k
$0
20182019202020212022
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

−$3k
’18
$15k
’19
$6k
’20
$88k
’21
−$125k
’22
6.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jason Soucinek

Executive director

Board chair

John Stevens

Chairman

As listed on its FY2022 Form 990.

20182019202020212022
Listed88777
Joined·+3+2+1+2
No longer listed·3312
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2022: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $12k → $23.

3 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 48% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PROJECT 619’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PROJECT 619 leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

48% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PROJECT 619.

43%
largest funder
90%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 54% · 2018 52% · 2019 54% · 2020 73% · 2021 80% · 2022 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

82% of PROJECT 619's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
MT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
’21
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $106k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like PROJECT 619

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

70% of spending goes to programs.

Program 70%Management 15%Fundraising 15%

Governance

6
board members
0%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PROJECT 619: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PROJECT 619?
PROJECT 619 (Washington) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $221,639 to it, the largest being M J MURDOCK CHARITABLE TRUST ($94,500). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PROJECT 619 have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $221,639 in grants to PROJECT 619, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PROJECT 619?
M J MURDOCK CHARITABLE TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $94,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PROJECT 619 find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2018–2022), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing