Loading…
Loading…
Pennsylvania · Nonprofit
PITTSBURGH JEWISH PUBLICATION & EDU (Pennsylvania) is funded by 8 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,338,169 in grants to it, the largest being JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ($1,062,769). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
PITTSBURGH JEWISH PUBLICATION & EDU runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 11,006 arts & culture nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,006 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2018
$125k from 3 funders in 2024, up from $225k and 2 in 2018.
4 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 90% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of PITTSBURGH JEWISH PUBLICATION & EDU’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
PITTSBURGH JEWISH PUBLICATION & EDU leans on a few funders — its largest provides 79% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 92% · 2019 100% · 2020 99% · 2021 71% · 2022 74% · 2023 100% · 2024 80% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
33% of PITTSBURGH JEWISH PUBLICATION & EDU's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
PITTSBURGH JEWISH PUBLICATION & EDU is locally rooted: 90% of its grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 8 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
76% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2018 (financials across 2018–2018), and the filings of 8funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing