Skip to content

Connecticut · Nonprofit

PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving

PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving (Connecticut) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $92,598 to it, the largest being PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ($90,372). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2019
$48k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$93k
Net assets
$30k
2/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 36%
01What it does

What PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving does

Mission

Animal Rescue

As stated on its FY2019 Form 990-EZ.

Program

Provide temporary shelter and care for homeless and abandoned cats and kittens with the ultimate goal of finding permanent home placement.

The first program described on its most recent Form 990-EZ.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($147k) Expenses 100 ($149k) Net assets 100 ($2k)2018 Revenue 16 ($24k) Expenses 17 ($25k) Net assets 26 ($434)2019 Revenue 32 ($48k) Expenses 12 ($18k) Net assets 1823 ($30k)
201720182019
Revenue (32)Expenses (12)Net assets (1823)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $434 to $30k (+6840%).

$2k
$434
$30k
201720182019
Total assets

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 6,580 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.

−$2k
’17
−$1k
’18
$30k
’19
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $14k → $12k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
1
1
3
3
2
2
1

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 4 of 5 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving leans on a few funders — its largest provides 98% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving.

98%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 96% · 2021 95% · 2022 96% · 2023 98% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $453 that is directly attributable, 51% of it comes from funders outside Connecticut, across 2 states.

NY
CT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
Connecticut out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $92k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,048 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin62% · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−43% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,048 animals nonprofits under $100k, FY2019

Organizations like PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Connecticut

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

73%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CT

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving?
PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving (Connecticut) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $92,598 to it, the largest being PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ($90,372). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $92,598 in grants to PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving?
PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND is the largest funder on record, with $90,372 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Connecticut. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds PAWS Pound Animals are Worth Saving →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2019 (financials across 2017–2019), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing