Skip to content

Idaho · Nonprofit

NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP

NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP (Idaho) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $143,251 to it, the largest being GRASSLANS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ($125,500). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$357k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$143k
Net assets
$139k
3/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 85%
01What it does

What North American Grouse Partnership does

Mission

The mission of the North American Grouse Partnership is to ensure the conservation of North America's native grouse species and the landscapes they live in.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Lesser Prairie Chicken Conservation - The NAGP continued the development and expansion of the Lesser Prairie Chicken Landowner Alliance (LPCLA) in the SW United States using a grant from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and significant donations from other private and corporate partners. THE LPCLA is a regional strategy for conserving and restoring grassland habitat necessary for lesser prairie chicken survival. It is an outcome-based approach that pays ranchers fair-market value for the conservations services that they agree to provide to conserve and restore grassland environments. The long-term goal of this project is to establish ten (10) 200,000 acre ranching strongholds in five states. During the first year of the project 100,000 acres were enrolled in the LPCLA.

    $143,874 spentof which $143,349 as grants
    67% of program spending
  2. Partnership Development - NAGP worked to develop partnerships with other public and private organizations focused on landscape-scale grassland conservation. The goal of these activities is to build the coalition needed to establish the foundation that can advocate for the importance of viable native landscapes for prairie grouse and wildlife species that is needed to expand the Lesser Prairie Chicken Landowner Alliance to its goal of ten (10) 200,000 acre ranching strongholds.

    $40,035 spent
    19% of program spending
  3. Grassland Conservation - The NAGP worked with other conservation organizations and agencies to help ensure that implementation of programs for the conservation of grasslands and grouse species are being implemented in the most effective ways possible. The organization provided technical input to ongoing conservation efforts that have the most potential for enhancing and restoring grasslands and native grouse species.

    $30,707 spent
    14% of program spending
  4. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $214,616.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($68k) Expenses 100 ($46k) Net assets 100 ($54k)2021 Revenue 70 ($48k) Expenses 85 ($39k) Net assets 117 ($63k)2022 Revenue 118 ($80k) Expenses 141 ($64k) Net assets 146 ($79k)2023 Revenue 157 ($107k) Expenses 202 ($92k) Net assets 173 ($93k)2024 Revenue 146 ($100k) Expenses 329 ($150k) Net assets 80 ($43k)2025 Revenue 524 ($357k) Expenses 573 ($261k) Net assets 257 ($139k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (524)Expenses (573)Net assets (257)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $47k to $143k (+201%).

$54k
$63k
$79k
$95k
$47k
$143k
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,042 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$22k
’20
$9k
’21
$16k
’22
$14k
’23
−$50k
’24
$96k
’25
6.3
months of
reserve
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income fell $26k → $11k.

2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 11% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 88% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

88%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 98% · 2020 95% · 2021 99% · 2022 99% · 2023 94% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Idaho, across 2 states in all.

DE
NM

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Idaho out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $16k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,693 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin27% · top quartile
Months of reserve6.3mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)39% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,693 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Idaho

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

82% of spending goes to programs.

Program 82%Management 14%Fundraising 3%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 13 states

AK
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
OR
OH
CA
CO
NM
KS
OK

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP?
NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP (Idaho) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $143,251 to it, the largest being GRASSLANS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ($125,500). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $143,251 in grants to NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP?
GRASSLANS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $125,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NORTH AMERICAN GROUSE PARTNERSHIP find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Idaho. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds North American Grouse Partnership →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing