How much did NEVADA ALLIANCE grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of NEVADA ALLIANCE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

actionadvocacy

2020

votersapiaengageadvocacyactioncoordinateelectoral

2021

advocacysocial

2022

planned parenthoodworkerseducation plannedparenthood affiliatesparticipationrightsleadership

2023

apiaengage

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k4 grants · $90k
$50k–250k13 grants · $1.1M
$250k+11 grants · $18M

$125,000

Median grant

States reached

$383k

Total assets

Largest grants

FAIR GOVERNMENT NEVADA$7,540,000
WORKERS VOTE$2,775,000
PROTECT YOUR VOTE NV$2,760,000
FORWARD ACTION FUND$2,000,000
NEVADANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM$915,000
SOMOS PAC$800,000
FOR OUR FUTURE ACTION FUND$420,000
NEVADA STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY$350,000
ONE APIA NEVADA$250,000
WORKER POWER PAC$250,000
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS VICTORY FUND$250,000
NEWVOTE NEVADA$190,000
NEVADA LEGISLATIVE VICTORY$150,000
NATIVE VOTERS ALLIANCE NEVADA$125,000
COURIER NEWSROOM INC$100,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$15M · 17 repeat orgs$17M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +431% since the first grant, against +96% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$15M

$7.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+431%

+96%

Still filing today

59%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.5M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Civil RightsCommunity ImprovementEducationPublic BenefitEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FF
Family Friendly Action Fund
2× · 2022–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +24023%
NC
Nevada Conservation League
2× · 2022–2024 · $680k · revenue +124% · 54% of their budget
OA
One APIA Nevada
3× · 2020–2024 · $425k · revenue +1733%

Funded once

AS
A Stronger Nevada
one grant, 2022 · $3.0M
UH
Unite Here Action Fund
one grant, 2022 · $2.6M · revenue -26%
HM
Home Means Nevada
one grant, 2022 · $400k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Nevada Alliance

The Nevada Alliance is a state-based donor collaborative committed to building sustainable Democratic gains. We connect smart investment opportunities to passionate and committed investors for Nevada-specific gains on the issues that…

—

Fair Government Nevada

To promote fair government practices and for all other legal purposes

—

Institute for a Progressive Nevada

Institute for a Progressive Nevada educates, empowers, and engages Nevadans to build a state where everyone has a fair opportunity to succeed.

Civil Rights

The American Federation of Labor

Representing organized workers in labor/management relations in the state of nevada and in the legislative session

—

Nevada Wildlife Federation

The Nevada Wildlife Federation is the Oldest 501(c)(3) statewide conservation organization dedicated to sustaining Nevada's wildlife through conservation and education.

Animals

Nevada Rural Electric Association

Partnering to advocate and advance the benefits of consumer-owner power and to provide value for our utility members.

Community Improvement

American Civil Liberties Union of

The american civil liberties union of nevada foundation inc serves to protect adn defend the civil liberties of all persons in nevada as provided by the united states constitution and bill of rights.

—

National Popular Vote

To educate the public regarding its proposal to implement a Nationwide Popular Vote Election of the President of the United States

Public Benefit

Nevada Center for Civic Engagement

Our mission is to promote and support the study of history, law and civics for the development of responsible and informed citizens who are committed to democratic principles and active engagement in representative government.

Education

Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada Action

Plan action seeks to transform progressive ideas into policy through rapid response communications, legislative action, grassroots organizing, policy advocacy, and partnerhips with other progressive leaders and organizations

Civil Rights

Nevada Realtors

To protect private property rights and enhance the success and profitability of the real estate profession.

—

Nevada Legal Services Inc

To ensure equal access to justice for low-income nevadans.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada and the most unlike its peers is Forward Action Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/25

Grantees still filing

21/25

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$29,189,317Civil Rights$2,492,138International$425,000Community Improvement$266,000Environment$50,000Education$50,000Public Benefit$50,000Human Services$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

America VotesDC35× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: America Votes · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Grove Action Fund · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Open Society Action Fund Inc · League of Conservation Voters Inc · Tides Advocacy · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund · Energy Action Fund · Clean and Prosperous America · Tides Foundation · Georgia Investor Action Fund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NEVADA ALLIANCE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NAPPA.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 264715618 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on NAPPA, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 76% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Nevada Alliance?

Find your warmest path to Nevada Alliance through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NEVADA ALLIANCE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Nevada Alliance?

More from the funding graph

NEVADA ALLIANCE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Nevada Alliance?

More from the funding graph