Skip to content

Maryland · Nonprofit

NATL ORG OF BLACK LAW ENFORC EXEC

NATL ORG OF BLACK LAW ENFORC EXEC (Maryland) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $49 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($49). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$65k
Funders on record
1
Grants received
$49
Net assets
$60k
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Natl Org of Black Law Enforc Exec does

Mission

Develop, sponsor, and support community services which help to build and strengthen communities

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. NOBLE WASHINGTON METRO ADVANCED EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY. In 2025, we successfully advanced our Funding Plan for the American University Endowment. NOBLE Washington Metro held its 38th annual crab feast to raise money for scholarships. We awarded two (2) scholarships to college students at Howard University. NOBLE Washington Metro expanded access to higher education and invested in the next generation of leaders.

    $24,000 spent
    81% of program spending
  2. NOBLE WASHINGTON METRO DEMONSTRATED ITS EMPHASIS ON SERVICE, SAFETY, AND MAKING A MEANINGFUL LOCAL IMPACT. NOBLE Washington Metro coordinated a Build-A-Bike Program and built 100 bicycles for children in the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia region. NOBLE Washington Metro also coordinated a Back-to-School drive and a Christmas Toy Drive. School supplies were distributed to children at Stanton Elementary School and every child at Plummer Elementary School received a Christmas gift.

    $5,454 spent
    19% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $29,454.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($72k) Expenses 100 ($62k) Net assets 100 ($55k)2018 Revenue 106 ($76k) Expenses 111 ($69k) Net assets 114 ($63k)2019 Revenue 133 ($96k) Expenses 151 ($93k) Net assets 118 ($65k)2020 Revenue 41 ($30k) Expenses 50 ($31k) Net assets 118 ($65k)2021 Revenue 87 ($63k) Expenses 92 ($57k) Net assets 130 ($72k)2022 Revenue 121 ($87k) Expenses 131 ($81k) Net assets 140 ($77k)2023 Revenue 121 ($87k) Expenses 162 ($100k) Net assets 116 ($65k)2024 Revenue 209 ($151k) Expenses 234 ($145k) Net assets 128 ($71k)2025 Revenue 90 ($65k) Expenses 122 ($76k) Net assets 109 ($60k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (90)Expenses (122)Net assets (109)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $77k to $65k (−17%).

$55k
$65k
$71k
$65k
$72k
$77k
$65k
$71k
$61k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$10k
’17
$8k
’18
$2k
’19
−$1k
’20
$6k
’21
$6k
’22
−$13k
’23
$7k
’24
−$11k
’25
9.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed888888888
Joined·+0+4+1+0+4+0+3+1
No longer listed·04104031
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2022 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $21 → $28.

Funder
'22
'23
total
funders
1
1

1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of NATL ORG OF BLACK LAW ENFORC EXEC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of NATL ORG OF BLACK LAW ENFORC EXEC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $49 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like NATL ORG OF BLACK LAW ENFORC EXEC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Maryland

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

39% of spending goes to programs.

Program 39%Management 10%Fundraising 51%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NATL ORG OF BLACK LAW ENFORC EXEC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NATL ORG OF BLACK LAW ENFORC EXEC?
NATL ORG OF BLACK LAW ENFORC EXEC (Maryland) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $49 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($49). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does NATL ORG OF BLACK LAW ENFORC EXEC have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $49 in grants to NATL ORG OF BLACK LAW ENFORC EXEC, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NATL ORG OF BLACK LAW ENFORC EXEC?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $49 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NATL ORG OF BLACK LAW ENFORC EXEC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Maryland. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Natl Org of Black Law Enforc Exec →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 1 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing