Loading…
Loading…
North Carolina · Nonprofit
NATIONAL WOMEN'S SOCCER LEAGUE PLAYERS (North Carolina) is funded by 4 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $127,500 in grants to it, the largest being UNITED STATES WOMEN'S NATIONAL SOCCER ($50,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
NATIONAL WOMEN'S SOCCER LEAGUE PLAYERS holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,287 employment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,287 employment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
2% of NATIONAL WOMEN'S SOCCER LEAGUE PLAYERS’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (15% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
$0 from 1 funders in 2024, up from $53k and 2 in 2020.
From the IRS filings of NATIONAL WOMEN'S SOCCER LEAGUE PLAYERS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
NATIONAL WOMEN'S SOCCER LEAGUE PLAYERS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 39% of grant income and the top three 80%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 52% · 2021 33% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
NATIONAL WOMEN'S SOCCER LEAGUE PLAYERS draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside North Carolina — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2020–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing