Loading…
Loading…
Michigan · Nonprofit
MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER WEST BRANCH (Michigan) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $861,127 in grants to it, the largest being MICHIGAN CENTER FOR RURAL HEALTH ($377,416). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER WEST BRANCH has grown faster than half of the 4,494 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,494 health nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
2% of MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER WEST BRANCH’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (7% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
$12k from 1 funders in 2024, up from $29k and 1 in 2019.
From the IRS filings of MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER WEST BRANCH’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER WEST BRANCH leans on a few funders — its largest provides 44% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 52% · 2021 65% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% · 2024 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER WEST BRANCH is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Michigan funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you under-funded among the 264 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
87% of spending goes to programs.
Part of a family of 12 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2019–2023), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing