Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bash Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$72kHealth$54kArts & Culture$25kCommunity Improvement$15kHuman Services$13kRecreation & Sports$9kHousing & Shelter$7kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$625
Median grant
6
States reached
$369k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARK RIVER-HARRIS SCHOOL TEACHER$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEAR$5,000
BAY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,500
BONIFAS ARTS CENTER$2,000
FRIENDS OF ESCANABA LIBRA$2,000
DIG DEEP$1,000
GLADSTONE HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTERS$1,000
UP CHILDERN'S MUSEUM$1,000
UP ANIMAL WELFARE SHELTER$625
CLAWS AND PAWS RESCUE$625
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$625
MARQUETTE CITY BAND$625
SAHUARITA FOOD BANK$500
ST JOSEPH'S SVDP CONFERENCE$500
SALVATION ARMY OF MARQUETTE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LA POSADA AT PARK CENTRE: $3k → 15%LA POSADA AT PARK CENTRE: $3k → 15%LAPOSADA FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$216k · 33 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
6

Total granted

$216k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+23%

Still filing today

27%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ESCANABA PUBLIC LIBR
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +31%
  • WB
    WILLIAM BONIFAS FINE ARTS CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +45%
  • LP
    LA POSADA AT PARK CENTRE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • LP
    LA POSADA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • TF
    TOLLFREE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Spcala is dedicated to the prevention of cruelty to animals through education, law enforcement, intervention and advocacy.

Animals
2
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
3
Posada Life Holdings Inc

The purpose of holdings is to hold title to property in accordance with section 501(c)(2) of the internal revenue code, collecting income therefrom, and turning over the entire income, less expenses to any tax-exempt 501(c)(3) entity…

Community Improvement
4
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
5
Paws in the Panhandle Rescue and Adoption

Committed to the rescue and adoption of animals from shelters, reducing the euthanasia of adoptable pets within our community. using community resources, we will provide and support an adoptive friendly no-kill shelter for rescued animals…

Animals
6
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
7
Mt Pleasant Animal Shelter Inc

The shelter's mission is to provide exceptional care for homeless animals, to promote spaying and neutering, microchipping and humane education, and to place homeless cats and dogs in permanent, loving homes.

Animals
8
Santa Fe Animal Shelter and Humane Society Inc

To support animals, save lives, and spread compassion.

Animals
9
The Arizona Pet Project

The arizona pet project creates systemic change and provides resources, so no families are forced to balance their own basic needs of food, shelter, and safety and the needs of their companion animals, often the only meaningful connection…

Animals
10
Humane Society of Pinellas Inc

The humane society of pinellas' mission is to prevent animal homelessness in our community and provide care and assistance to those in need.

Animals
11
Texas Panhandle Pet Savers Inc

Dog and cat rescue group with a mission to decrease the number of pets put down in the amarillo area by raising awareness of adoptable pets and providing resources and programs to successfully place them in permanent homes.

12
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Posada At Park Centre Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gladstone High School Baseball Boosters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEAR — $39,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARBARK RIVER SCHOOL TEACHER — $30,000 · OtherBARK RIVER SCHOOL TEACHERFRIENDS OF THE ESCANABA PUBLIC LIBR — $18,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ESCANABA PUBLIC LIBRBARK RIVER-HARRIS SCHOOL TEACHER — $15,000 · OtherBARK RIVER-HARRIS SCHOOL TEACHERBAY DE NOC COMMUNITY COLL — $15,000 · OtherBAY DE NOC COMMUNITY COLLPOSADA LIFE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Other+23 more — $60,700 · Other+23 moreWILLIAM BONIFAS FINE ARTS CENTER — $10,000 · Arts & CultureMARQUETTE CITY BAND INC — $1,875 · Arts & CultureGLADSTONE HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL BOOSTERS INC — $9,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,875 · EducationLA POSADA AT PARK CENTRE INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesLA POSADA FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000 · Human ServicesCLAWS AND PAWS RESCUE — $1,875 · AnimalsUPPER PENINSULA ANIMAL WELFARE SHELTER INC — $1,875 · AnimalsSAHUARITA FOOD BANK — $1,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$187,700Arts & Culture$11,875Education$10,875Human Services$8,500Animals$3,750Food & Nutrition$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ESCANABA PUBLIC LIBR — $18,000 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetWILLIAM BONIFAS FINE ARTS CENTER — $10,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetGLADSTONE HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL BOOSTERS INC — $9,000 over 9y, 6.2% of budgetLA POSADA AT PARK CENTRE INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLAWS AND PAWS RESCUE — $1,875 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetUPPER PENINSULA ANIMAL WELFARE SHELTER INC — $1,875 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,875 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARQUETTE CITY BAND INC — $1,875 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAHUARITA FOOD BANK — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ESCANABA PUBLIC LIBR
  • Who funds WILLIAM BONIFAS FINE ARTS CENTER
  • Who funds GLADSTONE HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL BOOSTERS INC
  • Who funds DIG DEEP
  • Who funds LA POSADA AT PARK CENTRE INC
  • Who funds LA POSADA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CLAWS AND PAWS RESCUE
  • Who funds UPPER PENINSULA ANIMAL WELFARE SHELTER INC
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MARQUETTE CITY BAND INC
  • Who funds SAHUARITA FOOD BANK
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bash Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph