Loading…
Loading…
Michigan · Nonprofit
MONA LAKE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION (Michigan) is funded by 5 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $24,300 in grants to it, the largest being THE MISSAD FOUNDATION ($18,500). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
MONA LAKE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION has grown faster than three-quarters of the 2,644 community improvement nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,644 community improvement nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The base broadened — 1 funders to 2 as grant income moved $1k → $6k.
From the IRS filings of MONA LAKE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
MONA LAKE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 76% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 67% · 2022 89% · 2023 100% · 2024 91% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
MONA LAKE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Michigan funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 147 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing