Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL

MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $55,808 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($25,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 93% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$76k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$56k
Net assets
$1.9M
5/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 11%
01What it does

What Mohawk Valley Stewardship Council does

Mission

Connecting people with their natural and cultural heritage and providing a community gathering place through restoration and operation of the White Sulphur Springs Ranch"Goals1)To acquire, restore, operate and sustain the White Sulphur Springs Ranch and it's natural and cultural resources while creating functional facilities conducive to public use and use by the disabled.2)To promote healthy lifestyles, connect people with nature, and cultivate community engagement through providing a community gathering place, recreation and environmental education center at the White Sulphur Springs Ranch. 3)To promote citizen stewardship of the Mohawk Valley region through community involvement, leveraging resources and increasing capacity for the benefit of current and future generations.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. To acquire, restore, operate and sustain the White Sulphur Springs Ranch and it's natural and cultural resources while creating functional facilities conducive to public use and use by the disabled.

    $33,436 spent
    100% of program spending
  2. White Sulfur Springs Ranch Living history School days:The program provides both a natural history environment and a living history opportunity given the remaining structures on the ranch property. The program had its debut in 2012 when almost 50 3rd grade students from C.R. Carmichael Elementary School in Portola were bused to the ranch where they participated in hands-on activities learning about life on the ranch in 1858. Students learned about blacksmithing and how important that skill was in maintaining ranch property. They also performed laundry activities, engaged in leather repairs, built wooden fruit boxes, played games, learned about native americans that lived in the Mohawk Valley in the 1800's and learned about the environment on the ranch that is still rich today.

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $33,436.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($103k) Expenses 100 ($98k) Net assets 100 ($1.4M)2018 Revenue 107 ($111k) Expenses 166 ($163k) Net assets 96 ($1.3M)2019 Revenue 188 ($194k) Expenses 185 ($182k) Net assets 97 ($1.3M)2020 Revenue 33 ($34k) Expenses 20 ($20k) Net assets 124 ($1.7M)2021 Revenue 87 ($90k) Expenses 47 ($46k) Net assets 127 ($1.7M)2022 Revenue 91 ($94k) Expenses 42 ($41k) Net assets 131 ($1.8M)2023 Revenue 128 ($132k) Expenses 88 ($86k) Net assets 134 ($1.8M)2024 Revenue 74 ($76k) Expenses 38 ($37k) Net assets 137 ($1.9M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (74)Expenses (38)Net assets (137)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $1.3M to $1.7M (+27%).

$1.5M
$1.3M
$1.3M
$1.7M
$1.7M
$1.8M
$1.8M
$1.9M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

96% of MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (39% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 15,075 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$5k
’17
−$53k
’18
$12k
’19
$14k
’20
$44k
’21
$53k
’22
$46k
’23
$39k
’24
55
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed98666777
Joined·+3+0+0+0+1+0+3
No longer listed·4200003
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income fell $10k → $7k.

4 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 93% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 45% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

93% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL.

45%
largest funder
92%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 72% · 2021 97% · 2022 100% · 2023 95% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

93% of MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $4k that is directly attributable, 70% of it comes from California funders.

WA
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’20
’21
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $52k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 13,282 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.

Operating margin52% · top quartile
Months of reserve54.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,282 recreation & sports nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Organizations like MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

91% of spending goes to programs.

Program 91%Management 1%Fundraising 9%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL?
MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $55,808 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($25,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 93% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $55,808 in grants to MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL?
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC is the largest funder on record, with $25,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MOHAWK VALLEY STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Mohawk Valley Stewardship Council →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing