Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

MISSION TO ASIA

MISSION TO ASIA (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $67,150 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($60,550). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$26k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$67k
Net assets
$238k
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 17%
01What it does

What Mission to Asia does

Mission

Support a training center in teruvalla, karala india

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. Program operations india

    $24,817 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $24,817.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($202k) Expenses 100 ($152k) Net assets 100 ($272k)2018 Revenue 77 ($156k) Expenses 112 ($170k) Net assets 99 ($268k)2019 Revenue 73 ($147k) Expenses 119 ($181k) Net assets 85 ($231k)2020 Revenue 70 ($142k) Expenses 97 ($148k) Net assets 83 ($225k)2021 Revenue 74 ($150k) Expenses 89 ($135k) Net assets 88 ($240k)2022 Revenue 53 ($108k) Expenses 84 ($127k) Net assets 81 ($221k)2023 Revenue 59 ($119k) Expenses 57 ($87k) Net assets 93 ($254k)2024 Revenue 61 ($123k) Expenses 91 ($138k) Net assets 88 ($240k)2025 Revenue 13 ($26k) Expenses 17 ($25k) Net assets 88 ($238k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (13)Expenses (17)Net assets (88)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $268k to $231k (−14%).

$272k
$268k
$231k
$225k
$240k
$221k
$254k
$240k
$238k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of MISSION TO ASIA’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,623 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$50k
’17
−$14k
’18
−$34k
’19
−$6k
’20
$15k
’21
−$19k
’22
$33k
’23
−$14k
’24
$481
’25
22
months of
reserve
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income rose $5k → $16k.

3 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MISSION TO ASIA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MISSION TO ASIA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 90% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MISSION TO ASIA.

90%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 93% · 2018 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of MISSION TO ASIA's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $67k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MISSION TO ASIA's revenue fell 87% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin2% · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−23% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,869 religion nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like MISSION TO ASIA

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MISSION TO ASIA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MISSION TO ASIA?
MISSION TO ASIA (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $67,150 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($60,550). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does MISSION TO ASIA have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $67,150 in grants to MISSION TO ASIA, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MISSION TO ASIA?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $60,550 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MISSION TO ASIA find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Mission to Asia →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing