Loading…
Loading…
Texas · Nonprofit
LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CORP I (Texas) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $516,693 in grants to it, the largest being Valley Baptist Legacy Foundation ($371,146). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CORP I runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 4,196 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,196 human services nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $6k → $31k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
From the IRS filings of LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CORP I’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CORP I leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 87% · 2020 91% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CORP I is locally rooted: 72% of its grant income comes from Texas funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $70.2M on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2021–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing