Loading…
Loading…
Louisiana · Nonprofit
LOUISIANA ASSOCIATION FOR (Louisiana) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $70 in grants to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($70). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
LOUISIANA ASSOCIATION FOR is better cushioned than half of the 4,442 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,442 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
1% of LOUISIANA ASSOCIATION FOR’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (87% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $16 → $31 on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of LOUISIANA ASSOCIATION FOR’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 1 of 2 funders by total. Association, not causation.
LOUISIANA ASSOCIATION FOR draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Louisiana — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 1 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
84% of spending goes to programs.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing