Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Pennsylvania · Nonprofit

LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION

LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $545,947 to it, the largest being RICHARD KING MELLON FOUNDATION ($500,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$895k
Revenue FY2024
4
Funders on record
$546k
Grants received
$2.2M
Net assets
2/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 95%

Against its field

LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION's revenue grew 66% between 2017 and 2024.

Operating margin−1% · below the median
Months of reserve4.5mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)7% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15,485 recreation & sports nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($541k) Expenses 100 ($565k) Net assets 100 ($637k)2018 Revenue 94 ($508k) Expenses 96 ($545k) Net assets 94 ($600k)2019 Revenue 98 ($528k) Expenses 97 ($550k) Net assets 91 ($579k)2020 Revenue 147 ($792k) Expenses 76 ($427k) Net assets 148 ($945k)2021 Revenue 149 ($805k) Expenses 104 ($585k) Net assets 183 ($1.2M)2022 Revenue 224 ($1.2M) Expenses 121 ($684k) Net assets 266 ($1.7M)2023 Revenue 254 ($1.4M) Expenses 145 ($821k) Net assets 353 ($2.2M)2024 Revenue 166 ($895k) Expenses 160 ($902k) Net assets 352 ($2.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (166)Expenses (160)Net assets (352)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 25% · 2020 17% · 2021 41% · 2022 17% · 2023 16% · 2024 25%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

58% of LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (18% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 16,078 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$24k
17
$37k
18
$21k
19
$366k
20
$220k
21
$529k
22
$552k
23
$6k
24
4.5
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $500k → $89.

Funder
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
Pirates Charitiesunclassified
$21k
funders
1
1
2
1
1
1
1

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 92% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

92%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 99% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION's grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.

PA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
21
Pennsylvania out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $383 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Pennsylvania

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 18%Fundraising 5%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

PA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION?
LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $545,947 to it, the largest being RICHARD KING MELLON FOUNDATION ($500,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $545,947 in grants to LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION?
RICHARD KING MELLON FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $500,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LATROBE-GLSD PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing