Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Nonprofit

LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC

LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,403,367 to it, the largest being KATHERINE MABIS MCKENNA FOUNDATION ($1,304,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$645k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$1.4M
Net assets
$901k
5/6 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Latrobe Cmty Revitalization Pgminc does

Mission

The mission of the organization includes the following: 1) to promote the historic preservation, protection and use of the city of latrobe's traditional downtown area, including that areas'commercial, civic and religious enterprises and residences. 2) to take remedial actions to eliminate the physical, economic and social deterioration of the city of latrobe's traditional downtown area and thereby promote the city of latrobe's historic preservation, contribute to its community betterment while lessening the burdens of the city of latrobe's government. 3) to disseminate information of and promote interest in the preservation, history, culture, architecture and public use of the city of latrobe's traditional downtown area. 4) to hold meetings, seminars and other activities for the instruction of members and the public in those activities such as building rehabilitation and design, economic restructuring and planning management that foster the preservation of the city of latrobe's traditi

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. To revitalize the downtown business district by preserving the historical architectute and strenghthening economic development.

    $406,323 spent
    99% of program spending
  2. The business incubator program creates and retains jobs in order to help businesses grow in downtown latrobe, pa on a long-term basis.

    $2,923 spent
    1% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $409,246.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($182k) Expenses 100 ($192k) Net assets 100 ($91k)2018 Revenue 278 ($505k) Expenses 245 ($471k) Net assets 137 ($124k)2019 Revenue 120 ($218k) Expenses 111 ($213k) Net assets 144 ($130k)2020 Revenue 173 ($314k) Expenses 127 ($243k) Net assets 221 ($200k)2021 Revenue 139 ($253k) Expenses 127 ($244k) Net assets 230 ($209k)2022 Revenue 154 ($279k) Expenses 137 ($263k) Net assets 248 ($225k)2023 Revenue 490 ($890k) Expenses 195 ($376k) Net assets 815 ($739k)2024 Revenue 355 ($645k) Expenses 251 ($483k) Net assets 994 ($901k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (355)Expenses (251)Net assets (994)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $228k to $741k (+225%).

$92k
$126k
$132k
$204k
$212k
$228k
$741k
$904k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 19% · 2019 25% · 2020 19% · 2021 16% · 2022 11% · 2023 3% · 2024 5%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

88% of LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (62% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,439 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$10k
’17
$34k
’18
$6k
’19
$70k
’20
$8k
’21
$16k
’22
$514k
’23
$162k
’24
7.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2018201920202021202220232024
Listed1010108999
Joined·+1+0+1+1+0+1
No longer listed·103001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $15k → $203k.

2 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 93% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

93%
largest funder
99%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 65% · 2020 96% · 2021 94% · 2022 98% · 2023 95% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC's grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.

PA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Pennsylvania out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $14k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 11,971 community improvement nonprofits its size.

Operating margin25% · top quartile
Months of reserve7.3mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)20% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,971 community improvement nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Government funding LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $87k on record.

Federal$87k
grants $87kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$87k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Pennsylvania

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

82% of spending goes to programs.

Program 82%Management 12%Fundraising 6%

Governance

9
board members
89%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

PA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC?
LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,403,367 to it, the largest being KATHERINE MABIS MCKENNA FOUNDATION ($1,304,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $1,403,367 in grants to LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC?
KATHERINE MABIS MCKENNA FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,304,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LATROBE CMTY REVITALIZATION PGMINC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing