Skip to content

Oregon · Nonprofit

LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP

LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP (Oregon) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,210,125 to it, the largest being SOUTHWESTERN OREGON WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD ($916,373). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$5.4M
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$1.2M
Net assets
$-12541
3/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 5%
01What it does

What Lane Workforce Partnership does

Mission

To meet the workforce needs of employers and individuals through partnerships and innovations in lane county, oregon.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Through our partnership with worksource oregon lane, lwp supported workforce innovation and opportunity act (wioa) adult and dislocated worker programs, helping individuals in lane county access training, job search assistance, and employment opportunities and supporting employers with recruitment and workforce solutions. Between july 2024 and june 2025, the following outcomes were achieved: - total enrolled participants: 187 - gained employment: 70 - average wage: 23.81 - 6 new businesses utilized the on-the-job training program - 17 individuals placed in on-the-job training opportunities

    $3,783,514 spentof which $2,751,601 as grants
    78% of program spending
  2. Lwp partnered with connected lane county to deliver both wioa youth and young adult and oregon youth employment program (oyep)services, supporting participants ages 14 - 24 in developing academic, occupational, and work- readiness skills. Between july 2024 and june 2025, the following outcomes were achieved: - total enrolled participants: 97 - gained employment: 26 - average wage: 19.05 - 66 engaged in work experiences - 62 completed internships with positive evaluations - 40 oyep paid internships and skills training

    $1,049,669 spentof which $1,049,669 as grants
    22% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $4,833,183.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.9M) Expenses 100 ($3.9M) Net assets 100 ($47k)2018 Revenue 104 ($4.0M) Expenses 103 ($4.0M) Net assets 102 ($48k)2019 Revenue 102 ($4.0M) Expenses 102 ($4.0M) Net assets 89 ($41k)2020 Revenue 91 ($3.5M) Expenses 91 ($3.5M) Net assets 68 ($32k)2021 Revenue 89 ($3.5M) Expenses 89 ($3.5M) Net assets 58 ($27k)2022 Revenue 128 ($5.0M) Expenses 125 ($4.9M) Net assets 236 ($110k)2023 Revenue 160 ($6.2M) Expenses 162 ($6.3M) Net assets 10 ($5k)2024 Revenue 145 ($5.6M) Expenses 144 ($5.6M) Net assets 1 ($651)2025 Revenue 138 ($5.4M) Expenses 138 ($5.4M) Net assets -27 ($-12541)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (138)Expenses (138)Net assets (-27)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $551k to $2.7M (+383%).

$858k
$864k
$556k
$695k
$551k
$2.7M
$963k
$1.1M
$977k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 97% · 2018 97% · 2019 99% · 2020 99% · 2021 100% · 2022 98% · 2023 92% · 2024 88% · 2025 98%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$13k
’17
$860
’18
−$6k
’19
−$10k
’20
−$4k
’21
$83k
’22
−$106k
’23
−$4k
’24
−$13k
’25
0.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Shondra Holliday

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed262930323432332730
Joined·+6+7+2+6+3+13+2+6
No longer listed·360451283
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $109k → $311k.

1 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $98k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Oregon Workforce Partnership). These are real filings, and they are not money LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP raised.

From the IRS filings of LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 76% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP.

76%
largest funder
97%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 57% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP's grant income comes from Oregon funders.

OR
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’22
’23
Oregon out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $30k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $30.5M on record — $447k federal, $30.1M state.

Federal$447k
grants $447kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Labor$447k
State$30.1M
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top programs
  • OTHER DISTRIBUTIONS TO SUBRECIPIENTS$28.5M
  • PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NON-IT$583k
  • OTHER SPECIAL PAYMENTS$535k
  • DISTRIBUTION TO NON-PROFIT ORG$444k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oregon

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 10%Fundraising 0%

Governance

27
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP?
LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP (Oregon) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,210,125 to it, the largest being SOUTHWESTERN OREGON WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD ($916,373). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $1,210,125 in grants to LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP?
SOUTHWESTERN OREGON WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD is the largest funder on record, with $916,373 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LANE WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing