Skip to content

Ohio · Nonprofit

JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY

JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY (Ohio) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $640,204 to it, the largest being United Way of Greater Cincinnati ($420,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$106k
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$640k
Net assets
$442
3/7 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Jurisdiction Wide Resident Advisory does

Mission

The purpose of j-rab as a non-profit corporation is to engage in including, without limitation, to promote and assist tenant organizations in having safe decent, sanitary and affordable housing.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Achieved advocate and negotiating voice for residents of cincinnati metropolitan housing authority

    $117,166 spent$106,250 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $117,166.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($313k) Expenses 100 ($307k) Net assets 100 ($29k)2018 Revenue 100 ($312k) Expenses 97 ($298k) Net assets 147 ($43k)2019 Revenue 90 ($282k) Expenses 93 ($285k) Net assets 139 ($41k)2020 Revenue 101 ($317k) Expenses 96 ($295k) Net assets 32 ($9k)2021 Revenue 75 ($234k) Expenses 77 ($237k) Net assets 59 ($17k)2022 Revenue 8 ($25k) Expenses 24 ($72k) Net assets 1124 ($327k)2023 Revenue 10 ($32k) Expenses 89 ($272k) Net assets 517 ($150k)2024 Revenue 20 ($63k) Expenses 66 ($203k) Net assets 47 ($14k)2025 Revenue 34 ($106k) Expenses 38 ($117k) Net assets 2 ($442)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (34)Expenses (38)Net assets (2)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $17k to $327k (+1804%).

$29k
$43k
$41k
$9k
$17k
$327k
$150k
$14k
$442
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 98% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2023 100% · 2024 100% · 2025 100%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (62% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,439 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$5k
’17
$14k
’18
−$2k
’19
$23k
’20
−$3k
’21
−$47k
’22
−$240k
’23
−$140k
’24
−$11k
’25
0.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed333333435
Joined·+0+0+0+0+0+2+0+3
No longer listed·00000111
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $2k → $96k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
$58k
funders
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
3
1

1 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 13% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 6 of 7 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 66% of grant income and the top three 89%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY.

66%
largest funder
89%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 69% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 83% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY's grant income comes from Ohio funders.

OH
CT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’21
’22
’23
Ohio out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $80k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 2 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−10% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.0mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−13% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,175 community improvement nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ohio

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OH

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY?
JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY (Ohio) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $640,204 to it, the largest being United Way of Greater Cincinnati ($420,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $640,204 in grants to JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY?
United Way of Greater Cincinnati is the largest funder on record, with $420,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like JURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Jurisdiction Wide Resident Advisory →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing