Skip to content

Virginia · Nonprofit

JAMES PARTNERSHIP

JAMES PARTNERSHIP (Virginia) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $205,164 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($195,168). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$13k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$205k
Net assets
$15k
3/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 69%
01What it does

What James Partnership does

Mission

The James Partnership desires to fulfill the command in the New Testament Epistle of James to be both "Hearers and Doers of the Word." We do this through the promotion of biblical principals of public policy and practical applications of those principals. Believing that the Bible holds the answers for people's physical, as well as spiritual prosperity. We see as part of this mission to help aid small villages in Africa and elsewhere with small economic development projects to enable the villagers to have a means of employment and provision for their families and to provide them a means for productivity and sustainability. To accomplish our purposes, the James Partnership is initially focusing on these principal projects: Churches and Villages Together, 1 Voice Films and The Animated Word where we are animating the book of Revelation.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. We have animated 22 chapters of the book of Revelation. We hope to finish this fully in the next year. We currently have apps on Apple and Google Play. We have started animating the books of Ruth, Esther, and Jonah. We continue our projects in poor villages in Africa. We have started a pineapple farm, a piggery, created many wells, supported a school program and helped with a fishery. We released a film--Logan's story which is now seen around the world in the Netherlands, the middle East, Australia and more. We just released a new documentary under 1Voicefilms on the Asbury Revival. We just finished the First Great Awakening, The Second Great Awakening, Toronto Blessing, Treasure Hunt, Azusa Street Revival, the Holy Spirit in Revivals. We also did a script on an amazing life. We are pitching this story.

    $14,217 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $14,217.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($410k) Expenses 100 ($395k) Net assets 100 ($41k)2018 Revenue 85 ($347k) Expenses 90 ($355k) Net assets 82 ($34k)2019 Revenue 22 ($89k) Expenses 28 ($110k) Net assets 26 ($11k)2020 Revenue 3 ($14k) Expenses 6 ($23k) Net assets 4 ($2k)2021 Revenue 8 ($34k) Expenses 4 ($17k) Net assets 51 ($21k)2022 Revenue 6 ($23k) Expenses 1 ($6k) Net assets 93 ($38k)2023 Revenue 2 ($7k) Expenses 3 ($12k) Net assets 81 ($33k)2024 Revenue 11 ($46k) Expenses 16 ($63k) Net assets 48 ($20k)2025 Revenue 3 ($13k) Expenses 5 ($18k) Net assets 37 ($15k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (3)Expenses (5)Net assets (37)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $45k to $26k (−43%).

$64k
$45k
$26k
$23k
$21k
$38k
$33k
$20k
$15k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of JAMES PARTNERSHIP’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,031 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$15k
’17
−$7k
’18
−$21k
’19
−$9k
’20
$18k
’21
$18k
’22
−$5k
’23
−$17k
’24
−$5k
’25
1.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Christopher Rogers

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

20172018
Listed44
Joined·+0
No longer listed·0
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $188k → $24.

4 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of JAMES PARTNERSHIP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

JAMES PARTNERSHIP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 95% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund JAMES PARTNERSHIP.

95%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 95% · 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of JAMES PARTNERSHIP's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $205k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

JAMES PARTNERSHIP's revenue fell 97% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−34% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−35% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,793 international nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like JAMES PARTNERSHIP

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Virginia

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

84%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 43 states

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
MS
GA
TX

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for JAMES PARTNERSHIP: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds JAMES PARTNERSHIP?
JAMES PARTNERSHIP (Virginia) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $205,164 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($195,168). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does JAMES PARTNERSHIP have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $205,164 in grants to JAMES PARTNERSHIP, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of JAMES PARTNERSHIP?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $195,168 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like JAMES PARTNERSHIP find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing